J. Niemeier
To Win
N. Hibino
To Win
Nao Hibino vs Ella Seidel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L L L
Form
L L W L W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Hibino 1 - 0 Seidel
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hibino winning 2 and Seidel winning 1. The last match between Hibino and Seidel was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | 1 |
| Ella Seidel | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(22-05-2025)
Nao Hibino
Ella Seidel
2
6
7
5
6
4
| Hibino | Stats | Seidel |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (17-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (25-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 174 | Ranking | 109 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 109 |
| 30 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 5 |
| 55% (398-331) | Career Total W/L | 59% (133-92) |
| $1,614,842 | Career Prize Money | $370,419 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
07 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Bencic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Ella Seidel
66%
(
83 of
125)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
48%
(
60 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 15 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:34:0 | Average Match Time | 2:34:0 |
| 66% (83/125) | 1st Serve % | 51% (45/89) |
| 59% (49/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (26/45) |
| 38% (16/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (18/44) |
| 88% (7/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (7/21) |
| 51% (45/89) | Return Points Win % | 48% (60/125) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hibino vs Seidel Match Preview :
- Recent analysis of second serve success shows Seidel leading with a 43.26% win rate, slightly better than Hibino's 40.69%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match outcome?
- When examining return game effectiveness, Seidel prevails in winning 52.57% of the opponent’s second serve points, marginally outperforming Hibino's 49.84%. However, Hibino excels in first serve returns with 34.85%, exceeding Seidel’s 28.35%. Will Hibino's stronger first serve returns give them an edge?
- Under pressure, Hibino narrowly surpasses Seidel in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 51.14% compared to Seidel’s 50.62%. How might this affect the match during critical moments?
- Over the past year, Seidel has a superior match win rate at 56.96%, in contrast to Hibino's 47.46%. Does this indicate an upper hand for Seidel in the overall head-to-head perspective?
- Considering surface preferences, Seidel boasts a 69% success rate on indoor hard courts, while Hibino prefers hard surfaces with a 57% win rate. Could the surface be a deciding factor?
- In terms of tournament experience, Seidel often competes in Challenger/ITF events, winning 59.52% of matches, while Hibino's experience on the Main tour results in a 50% win rate. How significant is the event level in determining the match favorite?
- Hibino has faced stronger opponents with an average rank of 159.1 compared to Seidel's 239.78 over the past year. Does this mean Hibino is more battle-tested?
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Hibino has a decisive advantage, winning 64% of those encounters, whereas Seidel records a 44% success rate. Is Hibino's edge in deciding sets pivotal?
- The breakpoint conversion rates are almost identical, with Seidel at 36.6% and Hibino at 36.13%. Can either player leverage this skill to break the opponent’s serve more effectively?
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
Seidel's marginal edge in second serve effectiveness and overall match win rate suggests a slight advantage in head-to-head performance against Hibino.
Nevertheless, Hibino's superior first serve return stats and experience against higher-ranked opponents could play a crucial role in leveling the playing field.
Additionally, Hibino's pronounced success in deciding sets might prove critical if the match extends to a third set.
Considering all factors, while each player has specific strengths, Hibino's prowess in key areas like first serve returns and clutch performance under pressure suggests they may have the upper hand.
Therefore, Hibino is predicted to likely emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Hibino vs Seidel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Nao Hibino
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
74 of
120)
8
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Nao Hibino
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Ella Seidel
66%
(
83 of
125)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
48%
(
60 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
80%
(
78 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ella Seidel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Ella Seidel
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
52
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Jana Fett
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Jule Niemeier
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Kayla Day
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve %
83%
(
52 of
63)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Ella Seidel
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
14
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanina Wickmayer
Player
Ella Seidel
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Sarah Van Emst
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
115)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (398/331) | Win/Loss | 59% (133/92) |
| 53% (885/786) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (297/220) |
| 52% (7870/7402) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2489/2237) |
| 57% (283/216) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) |
| 46% (55/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (72/55) |
| 58% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (41/19) |
| 52% (34/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1000 | Aces Total | 507 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1554 | Total Double Faults | 843 |
| 1:12:19 | Average Match Time | 1:31:57 |
| 464.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 318.17 |
| 65% (25013/38323) | 1st Serve % | 59% (8484/14467) |
| 61% (15163/25013) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5493/8484) |
| 46% (6172/13307) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2734/5994) |
| 47% (2215/4668) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (850/1870) |
| 45% (17224/38550) | Return Points Win % | 45% (6632/14753) |
| 48% (39/42) | Slam W/L | 59% (10/7) |
| 44% (28/36) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 56% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (103/104) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (18/21) |
| 59% (195/137) | Challenger W/L | 63% (101/59) |
| 83% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 55% (391/717) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (131/221) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (86/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (22/42) |
| 57% (124/217) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (36/68) |
| 86% (374/323) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (138/118) |
| 13% (374/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (138/19) |
| 20% (355/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (87/14) |
Hibino vs. Seidel Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
