Nao Hibino vs Anna Danilina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W W W W L
Form
W W L L L L L W W LHead To Head: Hibino 1 - 0 Danilina
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hibino winning 2 and Danilina winning 0. The last match between Hibino and Danilina was at the Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, JPN-KAZ 3-1, 12-04-2024, Round: Rubber 1, Surface: I.hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | 1 |
| Anna Danilina | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, JPN-KAZ 3-1(12-04-2024)
Nao Hibino
Anna Danilina
6
1
6
0
| Hibino | Stats | Danilina |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (17-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 166 | Ranking | 898 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 269 |
| 30 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 1 |
| 55% (398-329) | Career Total W/L | 50% (174-173) |
| $1,614,842 | Career Prize Money | $43,875 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:57:0 | Average Match Time | 0:57:0 |
| 80% (35/44) | 1st Serve % | 69% (27/39) |
| 69% (24/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 67% (6/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (2/12) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 62% (24/39) | Return Points Win % | 32% (14/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Nao Hibino
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Ella Seidel
66%
(
83 of
125)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
48%
(
60 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
80%
(
78 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Taylah Preston
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
43%
(
32 of
74)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Danilina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Anna Danilina
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
41%
(
13 of
32)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Danilina
Player
Lina Glushko
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Danilina
Player
Ulrikke Eikeri
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
39%
(
25 of
64)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
23 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Anna Danilina
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Anna Danilina
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
20 of
31)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Anna Danilina
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Anna Danilina
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (398/329) | Win/Loss | 50% (174/173) |
| 53% (884/782) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (399/394) |
| 52% (7850/7375) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3662/3562) |
| 57% (283/216) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (36/59) |
| 47% (55/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (103/80) |
| 58% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (35/32) |
| 52% (34/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 996 | Aces Total | 385 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1542 | Total Double Faults | 758 |
| 1:12:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 464.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 529.02 |
| 65% (24900/38136) | 1st Serve % | 67% (9365/14038) |
| 61% (15093/24900) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (5519/9365) |
| 46% (6142/13233) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1997/4673) |
| 47% (2209/4659) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (862/1818) |
| 45% (17167/38402) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6535/14217) |
| 49% (39/41) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (28/36) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 56% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 50% (103/104) | Main Tour W/L | 31% (9/20) |
| 59% (195/136) | Challenger W/L | 50% (130/132) |
| 83% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 73% (35/13) |
| 55% (391/715) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (170/339) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (86/150) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (37/75) |
| 57% (124/216) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (51/105) |
| 87% (373/323) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (177/148) |
| 13% (373/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (177/29) |
| 20% (354/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (170/26) |
Hibino vs. Danilina Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
