Prediction of Nancy Richey vs Chris Safford Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Richey vs C. Safford

Nancy Richey

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Chris Safford

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Richey 1 - 1 Safford

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nancy Richey winning 2 and Chris Safford winning 0. The last match between Chris Safford and Nancy Richey was at the US National Championships, 30-08-1967, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Draw getting the victory W/O.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Richey	1
Safford	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) US National Championships(08-30-67)

Stats

Chris Safford

Nancy Richey

(R3) Locust Valley(08-03-64)

Stats

Nancy Richey

Chris Safford

N. Richey vs C. Safford H2H Profile

N. Richey	Stats	C. Safford
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
79.14% (664-175)	Career Total W/L	35.29% (30-55)
1	Grass	1
9	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Richey vs C. Safford Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nancy Richey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chris Safford has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nancy Richey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chris Safford has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nancy Richey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chris Safford has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nancy Richey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chris Safford winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nancy Richey has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 84% (W/L 124/24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 77% (W/L 151/44). Chris Safford has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 84% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 22/43).
Player level: In the last year, Nancy Richey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chris Safford has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nancy Richey winning 1 times and Chris Safford being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nancy Richey winning 2 and Chris Safford winning 0.
The last match between Nancy Richey and Chris Safford was at the US National Championships, 30-08-1967, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Draw getting the victory W/O.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nancy Richey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chris Safford has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nancy Richey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chris Safford has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nancy Richey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chris Safford has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nancy Richey vs Chris Safford Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Richey vs C. Safford H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Richey	Stats	C. Safford
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Richey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
US Open - 28-08-1978
R1 Lesley HuntL. Hunt	L	6-3 4-6 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 29-05-1978
R2 Patricia BostromP. Bostrom	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R3 Viviana GonzalezV. Gonzalez	L	6-4 4-6 6-3	Stats
Hilton Head - 10-04-1978
R3 Regina MarsikovaR. Marsikova	L	7-5 6-0	Stats
Dallas - 06-03-1978
R3 Betty StoveB. Stove	L	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Safford Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Haverford - 19-08-1974
R3 Heather DahlgrenH. Dahlgren	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Haverford - 18-08-1970
R3 Peaches BartkowiczP. Bartkowicz	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 07-04-1969
R3 Judith SalomeJ. Salome	L	6-2 4-6 6-1	Stats
Baltimore - 13-08-1968
R4 Karen KrantzckeK. Krantzcke	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 22-07-1968
R3 Patti HoganP. Hogan	L	6-0 3-6 6-1	Stats

View All

N. Richey vs C. Safford Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Richey	Stats	C. Safford
79.14% (664/175)	YTD Win/Loss	35.29% (30/55)
76.63% (1374/419)	Sets Win/Loss	36.76% (68/117)
100.00% (10005/0)	Games Win/Loss	44.94% (768/941)
78.52% (117/32)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
83.19% (198/40)	Clay Win/Loss	37.50% (3/5)
67.89% (74/35)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
77.44% (151/44)	Grass Win/Loss	33.85% (22/43)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0	Average Opponent Rank	2.69
75.96% (79/25)	Slam W/L	22.22% (2/7)
67.86% (19/9)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
80.19% (85/21)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/3)
81% (649/806)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	33% (27/82)
50% (1/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
49% (17/35)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
60% (99/165)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (7/20)
94% (637/600)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (28/22)
5% (637/35)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (28/6)
31% (180/55)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (54/5)