Nana Kawagishi vs Yasmin Ezzat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L L W L L W W L L L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead-to-head: Kawagishi 0 - 1 Ezzat
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kawagishi winning 1 and Ezzat winning 2. The last match between Kawagishi and Ezzat was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Yasmin Ezzat getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-4.
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(19-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 4-6 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Nana Kawagishi
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nana Kawagishi vs Yasmin Ezzat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nana Kawagishi 0 - 1 Yasmin Ezzat
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
In terms of second serve performance in recent form, the statistics reveal intriguing insights. Over the past six months, Kawagishi has demonstrated exceptional prowess, winning an impressive 48.58% of points on their second serve. Comparatively, Ezzat has achieved a commendable 44.62% success rate. It is imperative to note that a profound correlation exists between these statistics and the accuracy of match predictions.
An analysis of return game statistics in recent form further enhances our predictive abilities. Kawagishi's remarkable performance is evident, as they have triumphed in 60.48% of their opponents' second serve points. In contrast, Ezzat has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 56.6%. For first serve returns, Kawagishi has achieved a respectable 36.64% success rate, while Ezzat stands at 38.68%. This data holds significant importance in determining the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head(H2H) matchup.
Examining their ability to handle pressure, we observe that Kawagishi has skillfully saved 55.35% of breakpoints in recent matches. Similarly, Ezzat has proven their mettle by saving 55.4% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable indicator for in-game betting predictions.
When considering their performance overview, Kawagishi has emerged victorious in 46.43% of matches played over the past year, with a win/loss record of 26/30. On the other hand, Ezzat has achieved a slightly higher success rate of 47.5%, with a win/loss record of 19/21. These statistics provide a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
An assessment of their performance on different surfaces brings further nuances into play. Kawagishi has excelled on Hard surfaces, securing a win rate of 53% (W/L 78/69). However, their performance on Grass has been comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 33% (W/L 1/2). Conversely, Ezzat has demonstrated remarkable proficiency on Clay, boasting a win rate of 58% (W/L 53/39). Nevertheless, their performance on Hard courts is relatively inferior, standing at a win rate of 47% (W/L 61/69).
Considering the level of opponents faced, Kawagishi has encountered adversaries with an average rank of 456.82, while Ezzat's opponents have possessed an average rank of 434.48 over the past 12 months. This information sheds light on the significance of opponent quality when determining match predictions.
In the event that this match goes into a deciding set, an assessment of their performance in such situations becomes pertinent. Kawagishi has navigated the challenges of deciding sets with resilience, emerging victorious in 26% of matches in the past 12 months. Conversely, Ezzat has achieved a success rate of 14% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide valuable insights for those interested in live predictions and betting.
While past player performance holds considerable predictive value, it is also crucial to analyze current event statistics once the competition is underway. These up-to-date figures offer an indication of an in-form player's capabilities. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below (eventStats) to obtain the latest insights if the players have participated in the current event. Furthermore, individual preferences and performances at specific events can impact the predictions, and thus must be duly considered.
Lastly, break point conversion rates have a significant bearing on in-game live betting tips. In recent form, Kawagishi has successfully converted 52.33% of their breakpoint opportunities, illustrating their proficiency in capitalizing on crucial moments. Ezzat, while slightly lower, maintains an admirable conversion rate of 47.94% when attempting to break their opponent's serve. These statistics are invaluable for making informed live betting decisions.
If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, an article provides a comprehensive starting point. Please note that it caters to the preferences of statistics enthusiasts.
Nana Kawagishi Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Nana Kawagishi
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Anna Siskova
Player
Nana Kawagishi
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
45%
(
19 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Kateryna Lazarenko
Player
Nana Kawagishi
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nana Kawagishi
Player
Anastasia Kovaleva
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nana Kawagishi
Player
Anja Wildgruber
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Nana Kawagishi
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
49%
(
27 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ava Williamson
Player
Nana Kawagishi
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Nana Kawagishi
Player
Francesca Simpson
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Junri Namigata
Player
Nana Kawagishi
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
77%
(
86 of
112)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Honoka Kobayashi
Player
Nana Kawagishi
82%
(
83 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Yasmin Ezzat Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
54 of
74)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Remika Ohashi
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Lara Pfeifer
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Tejaswini Narala
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
85%
(
53 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
15 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Iva Ivanova
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Verena Meliss
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
16
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yasmin Ezzat
Player
Nana Kawagishi
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Other Predictions
- Loading news...