Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Naima Karamoko vs Sarafina Olivia Hansen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Karamoko vs Hansen analysis and find out who is favored!
Naima Karamoko vs Sarafina Olivia Hansen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Karamoko has won 42.41% of points on his second serve, while Hansen has won 38.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Karamoko, in recent form, has won 58.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hansen has won 51.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.43% and 36.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Karamoko has saved 48.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hansen has saved 51.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Karamoko has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 30/ 25), with Hansen winning 51.72% (W/L 15/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Karamoko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 23/ 19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 38/ 59). Hansen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Karamoko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 18/ 14), where as Hansen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Karamoko winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Karamoko winning 2 and Hansen winning 0. The last match between Karamoko and Hansen was at the W25 Bastad, 03-05-2022, Q3, Clay with Naima Karamoko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:59:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Karamoko and Hansen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Karamoko winning 0 times and Hansen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Karamoko winning 0, and Hansen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Karamoko has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.89 while Hansen has played against players with an average rank of 54.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Karamoko has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hansen has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Karamoko has converted 54.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hansen has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Karamoko 1 - 0 Hansen
824
Rank
824
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
47% (125-143)
Career Total W/L
46% (19-22)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
50% (4-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Naima Karamoko | Sarafina Olivia Hansen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:59:0 | 0:59:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (27/42) | 48% (23/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (18/27) | 43% (10/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (9/15) | 32% (8/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (30/48) | 36% (15/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Naima Karamoko
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Naima Karamoko | Sarafina Olivia Hansen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 50% (4/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (17/20) | 50% (8/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (183/173) | 48% (66/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.71 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:15 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288 | 49 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (484/788) | 47% (158/334) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (302/484) | 59% (94/158) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (117/304) | 39% (69/176) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (47/94) | 47% (17/36) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (345/762) | 44% (142/323) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (5/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Naima Karamoko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Angela Lazic
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Naima Karamoko
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Naima Karamoko
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
5
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
9
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Cynthia Wanjala
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Naima Karamoko
50%
(
53 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
14
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Sarafina Olivia Hansen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Charlotte Van Zonneveld
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
38%
(
18 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tatyana Nikolenko
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
Player
Priyanka Rodricks
40%
(
19 of
48)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
40)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jada Robinson
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
Player
Thelya Ledain-Terrine
37%
(
19 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
12
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
On Yu Choi
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
32 of
71)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alisa Kummel
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Karamoko Vs Hansen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
