Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadine Keller vs Dejana Radanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Keller vs Radanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadine Keller vs Dejana Radanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Keller has won 40% of points on his second serve, while Radanovic has won 43.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Keller, in recent form, has won 61.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radanovic has won 58.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.1% and 40.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Keller has saved 38.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radanovic has saved 57.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Keller has won 43.18% of matches played (W/L 19/ 25), with Radanovic winning 69.57% (W/L 48/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Keller has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 55/ 46). Radanovic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 34/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Keller has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.19% of matches (W/L 19/ 24), where as Radanovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 48/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Keller winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Keller winning 4 and Radanovic winning 1. The last match between Keller and Radanovic was at the W40 La Marsa, 09-06-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Nadine Keller getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Keller and Radanovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Keller winning 1 times and Radanovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Keller winning 1, and Radanovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Keller has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.55 while Radanovic has played against players with an average rank of 303.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Keller has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radanovic has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Keller has converted 59.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radanovic has converted 50.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Keller 2 - 0 Radanovic
503
Rank
416
High
23
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
229
Rank
187
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
57% (134-103)
Career Total W/L
61% (330-209)
33% (2-4)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$12,023
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nadine Keller | Dejana Radanovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:30 | 2:23:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (100/155) | 62% (113/182) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (66/100) | 59% (67/113) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (25/55) | 39% (27/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (9/26) | 32% (6/19) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (88/182) | 41% (64/155) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Nadine Keller
Player
Dejana Radanovic
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-3 5-7 6-4 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Dejana Radanovic
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
119)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadine Keller | Dejana Radanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 54% (20/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (52/58) | 53% (184/163) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 80% (4/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:40 | 1:49:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 109.17 | 345.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (182/268) | 62% (738/1183) |
| 1st Serve W% | 52% (95/182) | 64% (470/738) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 33% (28/86) | 42% (186/445) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (23/49) | 52% (74/143) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (154/305) | 46% (518/1120) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 53% (9/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 60% (9/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Nadine Keller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Martinez Vaquero
Player
Nadine Keller
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve %
73%
(
8 of
11)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
57%
(
4 of
7)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
11
Total Points Won
10
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Nadine Keller
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
65%
(
17 of
26)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
0%
(
0 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
27
Total Points Won
19
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Nadine Keller
69%
(
84 of
122)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
24%
(
9 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
51%
(
62 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Nadine Keller
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
47 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Nadine Keller
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Maria Bondarenko
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Nadine Keller
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dejana Radanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Dejana Radanovic
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Tatiana Pieri
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Dejana Radanovic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Alina Granwehr
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dejana Radanovic
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Dejana Radanovic
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Lea Boskovic
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Robin Anderson
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Julia Middendorf
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Keller Vs Radanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
