Nadine Keller vs Chiara Scholl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L L W L
Form
L L W L L L W W L LHead To Head: Keller 1 - 0 Scholl
They have played 2 sets in total, with Keller winning 2 and Scholl winning 0. The last match between Keller and Scholl was at the W25 Monastir, 12-12-2023, First, Hard with Nadine Keller getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nadine Keller | 1 |
| Chiara Scholl | 0 |
W25 Monastir(12-12-2023)
7
5
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Nakashima PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Nadine Keller
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
5
0
Aces (Total)
0
4
Total Double Faults
5
1:14:0
Average Match Time
1:14:0
69% (40/58)
1st Serve %
47% (24/51)
70% (28/40)
1st Serve Win %
67% (16/24)
56% (10/18)
2nd Serve Win %
33% (9/27)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
100% (1/1)
51% (26/51)
Return Points Win %
34% (20/58)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nadine Keller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arina Bulatova
Player
Nadine Keller
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Luana Plaza Araujo
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
35%
(
6 of
17)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
12 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
29
Total Points Won
18
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Sacco
Player
Nadine Keller
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
76 of
100)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alyssa Reguer
Player
Nadine Keller
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Sara Lanca
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Nadine Keller
79%
(
64 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Perelygina
Player
Nadine Keller
91%
(
50 of
55)
1st Serve %
92%
(
54 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suana Tucakovic
Player
Nadine Keller
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Agustina Chlpac
Player
Nadine Keller
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Chiara Scholl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dilara Okur
Player
Chiara Scholl
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
41
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Chiara Scholl
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Tess Sugnaux
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
1
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Chiara Scholl
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Chiara Scholl
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Chiara Scholl
42%
(
14 of
33)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Viktorie Hazmukova
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
12
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (139/116)
Win/Loss
55% (438/363)
55% (312/256)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (969/821)
52% (2680/2442)
Games Win/Loss
52% (8268/7738)
56% (72/56)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (133/107)
52% (58/54)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (295/223)
60% (9/6)
Indoor Hard W/L
24% (10/32)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.02
Aces Per Game
0.1
51
Aces Total
810
0.34
Double Faults Per Game
0.31
839
Total Double Faults
2454
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
502.65
Average Opponent Rank
565.32
65% (8225/12663)
1st Serve %
53% (15141/28836)
56% (4634/8225)
1st Serve Win %
64% (9693/15141)
44% (1961/4439)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (5794/13694)
51% (919/1819)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (1798/3763)
49% (6386/12995)
Return Points Win %
47% (13305/28423)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
20% (2/8)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
32% (7/15)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (44/48)
Challenger W/L
51% (296/281)
58% (95/68)
Futures W/L
69% (133/59)
53% (132/247)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (433/793)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
53% (21/40)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (71/128)
39% (26/67)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (98/196)
82% (154/127)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (447/389)
17% (154/26)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (447/58)
11% (100/11)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
14% (354/48)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
