Prediction of Nadia Podoroska vs Veronika Erjavec Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
62% (398-247)
Career Total W/L
63% (243-141)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$1,662,496
Career Prize Money
$225,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nadia Podoroska vs Veronika Erjavec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Podoroska 0 - 0 Erjavec
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Podoroska has won 43.66% of points on their second serve, while Erjavec has won 52.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Podoroska, in recent form, has won 55.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Erjavec has won 56.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.98% and 41.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Podoroska has saved 58.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erjavec has saved 58.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Podoroska has won 47.27% of matches played (W/L 26/ 29), with Erjavec winning 61.04% (W/L 47/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 254/ 135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Erjavec has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 210/ 107), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 21.05% of matches (W/L 4/ 15), where as Erjavec has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.08% of matches (W/L 41/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Podoroska has played against opponents with an average rank of 116.44 while Erjavec has played against players with an average rank of 252.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Podoroska has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erjavec has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Podoroska has converted 49.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erjavec has converted 50.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Karolina Muchova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Nadia Podoroska
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Olivia Gadecki
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Nadia Podoroska
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Dayana Yastremska
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
117)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
12
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
83%
(
10 of
12)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
61 of
117)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Yufei Ren
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Nadia Podoroska
70%
(
89 of
128)
1st Serve %
65%
(
96 of
148)
1
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
9
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
55 of
96)
28%
(
11 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
15 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
51%
(
65 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
78 of
148)
141
Total Points Won
135
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Katerina Siniakova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Veronika Erjavec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Petra Martic
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Alana Subasic
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Veronika Erjavec
43%
(
33 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Arantxa Rus
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Panna Udvardy
36%
(
18 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Podoroska vs Erjavec?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Podoroska Vs Erjavec is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadia Podoroska | Veronika Erjavec |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 39% (19/30) | 58% (55/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:48 | 1:27:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 50.33 | 111.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (96/149) | 59% (198/335) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (58/96) | 66% (130/198) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (20/53) | 47% (64/137) |
| BPs Won% Total | 27% (6/22) | 42% (21/50) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (73/181) | 48% (167/351) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
