Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadia Podoroska vs Maria Camila OSORIO Serrano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Podoroska vs Serrano analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadia Podoroska vs Maria Camila OSORIO Serrano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Podoroska has won 45.13% of points on his second serve, while Serrano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Podoroska, in recent form, has won 55.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Serrano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Podoroska has saved 57.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Serrano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Podoroska has won 51.47% of matches played (W/L 35/ 33), with Serrano winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 249/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Serrano has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17), where as Serrano has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Podoroska has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.75 while Serrano has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Podoroska has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Serrano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Podoroska has converted 38.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Serrano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Podoroska 0 - 0 Serrano
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadia Podoroska | Maria Camila OSORIO Serrano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (24/26) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (229/232) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 25 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 74 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 183.73 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (916/1385) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (577/916) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (203/469) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (73/191) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (659/1498) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 13% (1/7) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (5/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (11/22) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 1st Match |
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Nadia Podoroska
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadia Podoroska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Francesca Jones
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
89)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
65 of
138)
127
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Marina Stakusic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
12
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Mccartney Kessler
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
10
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Nadia Podoroska
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Julia Riera
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Camila OSORIO Serrano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Marie Bouzkova
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Sara Errani
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
84%
(
69 of
82)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Tatjana Maria
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Anca Alexia Todoni
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Marina Stakusic
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
9
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Mccartney Kessler
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Laura Pigossi
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Alize Cornet
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Podoroska Vs Serrano Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
