Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadia Podoroska vs Madison Brengle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Podoroska vs Brengle analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadia Podoroska vs Madison Brengle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Podoroska has won 45.13% of points on his second serve, while Brengle has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Podoroska, in recent form, has won 55.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brengle has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Podoroska has saved 57.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brengle has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Podoroska has won 51.47% of matches played (W/L 35/ 33), with Brengle winning 51.61% (W/L 16/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 249/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Brengle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 340/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 45/ 45).
- Player level: In the last year, Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17), where as Brengle has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 13/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Podoroska winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Podoroska winning 2 and Brengle winning 3. The last match between Podoroska and Brengle was at the Oracle Challenger Series - Newport Beach, 01-02-2020, Semifinals, Hard with Madison Brengle getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Podoroska and Brengle have played a deciding set 1 times, with Podoroska winning 1 times and Brengle 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Podoroska winning 0, and Brengle 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Podoroska has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.75 while Brengle has played against players with an average rank of 147.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Podoroska has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brengle has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Podoroska has converted 38.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brengle has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Podoroska 1 - 1 Brengle
65
Rank
36
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
223
Rank
35
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
63% (381-226)
Career Total W/L
56% (556-436)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,547,821
Career Prize Money
$2,482,006
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nadia Podoroska | Madison Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 23 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:59 | 1:41:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (90/138) | 73% (136/187) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 43% (39/90) | 49% (67/136) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (23/48) | 49% (25/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (13/25) | 67% (14/21) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (95/187) | 55% (76/138) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Madison Brengle
Player
Nadia Podoroska
74%
(
81 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 7-5 0-6 6-3 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Madison Brengle
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
39%
(
19 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
42 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadia Podoroska | Madison Brengle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (24/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (229/232) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 183.73 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (916/1385) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (577/916) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (203/469) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (73/191) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (659/1498) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 13% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (11/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Nadia Podoroska
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadia Podoroska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Francesca Jones
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
89)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
65 of
138)
127
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Marina Stakusic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
12
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Mccartney Kessler
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
10
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
45 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Nadia Podoroska
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Julia Riera
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Su Jeong Jang
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Mary Stoiana
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Podoroska Vs Brengle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
