Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadia Echeverria Alam vs Annick Melgers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Alam vs Melgers analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadia Echeverria Alam vs Annick Melgers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Alam has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Melgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Alam, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Melgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Alam has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Alam has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Melgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Alam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 45/ 69). Melgers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Alam winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Alam winning 2 and Melgers winning 0. The last match between Alam and Melgers was at the Hammamet, 25-02-2018, Q2 round, Clay with Nadia Echeverria Alam getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Alam and Melgers have played a deciding set 0 times, with Alam winning 0 times and Melgers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Alam winning 0, and Melgers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Alam has played against opponents with an average rank of while Melgers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Alam has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Alam has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Alam 1 - 0 Melgers
891
Rank
758
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
43% (99-132)
Career Total W/L
44% (54-70)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nadia Echeverria Alam | Annick Melgers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadia Echeverria Alam | Annick Melgers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nadia Echeverria Alam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Ena Koike
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
15 of
18)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Echeverria Alam
Player
Leyla Fiorella Britez Risso
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Echeverria Alam
Player
Anushka Ashar
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Echeverria Alam
Player
Alessandra Crump
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seren Agar
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
1
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
9
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Lincer
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleonore Tchakarova
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
5
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
8
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Danielle Lao
Player
Nadia Echeverria Alam
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Annick Melgers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Dejnozkova
Player
Annick Melgers
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chiraz Bechri
Player
Annick Melgers
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Annick Melgers
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Annick Melgers
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annick Melgers
Player
Bente Spee
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alba Rey Garcia
Player
Annick Melgers
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
14 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
49
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Annick Melgers
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Annick Melgers
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
48%
(
46 of
96)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Alam Vs Melgers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
