Nadezda Petrova vs Julie Coin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L W L L
Form
W W W L W W W L L LH2H: Petrova 1 - 0 Coin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Petrova winning 2 and Coin winning 0. The last match between Petrova and Coin was at the U.S. Open - New York, 03-09-2009, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Nadezda Petrova getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nadezda Petrova | 1 |
| Julie Coin | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: U.S. Open - New York(03-09-2009)
Nadezda Petrova
Julie Coin
6
4
7
6
| Petrova | Stats | Coin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 60 |
| 43 | Age | 42 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 10 |
| 63% (476-285) | Career Total W/L | 58% (331-243) |
| $4,732,128 | Career Prize Money | $267,487 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Humbert PREDICTION Grass
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Engel VS Aliassime PREDICTION Grass
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Julie Coin
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 58% (46/79) | 1st Serve % | 45% (30/66) |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
| 45% (15/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 45% (30/66) | Return Points Win % | 42% (33/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nadezda Petrova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Nadezda Petrova
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Nadezda Petrova
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
88)
4
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Urszula Radwanska
47%
(
55 of
117)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
7
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
24 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
53%
(
62 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Silvia Soler-Espinosa
Player
Nadezda Petrova
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
25%
(
2 of
8)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
33%
(
1 of
3)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
8
Total Points Won
8
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carla Suarez Navarro
Player
Nadezda Petrova
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuai Peng
Player
Nadezda Petrova
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Yuliya Beygelzimer
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadezda Petrova
Player
Marta Domachowska
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julie Coin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mathilde Johansson
Player
Julie Coin
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Julie Coin
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Julie Coin
81%
(
74 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
51%
(
46 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
55 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julie Coin
Player
Tereza Martincova
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Julie Coin
Player
Mathilde Johansson
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julie Coin
Player
Anett Kontaveit
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Johanna Konta
Player
Julie Coin
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julie Coin
Player
Julia Grabher
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (476/285) | Win/Loss | 58% (331/243) |
| 61% (1065/682) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (754/586) |
| 55% (8808/7176) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6593/5994) |
| 61% (217/136) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (136/88) |
| 64% (114/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (50/62) |
| 62% (94/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (137/79) |
| 65% (51/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (8/14) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 2313 | Aces Total | 671 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1461 | Total Double Faults | 477 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 412.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 599.82 |
| 59% (17993/30589) | 1st Serve % | 54% (6095/11383) |
| 70% (12509/17959) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4142/6095) |
| 47% (5887/12589) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2373/5288) |
| 47% (1682/3598) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (529/1236) |
| 44% (13617/30746) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4810/11535) |
| 67% (109/54) | Slam W/L | 36% (14/25) |
| 59% (126/86) | Masters W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 63% (237/141) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (29/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 61% (234/149) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 77% (47/14) |
| 64% (472/741) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (326/562) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (84/172) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (84/161) |
| 53% (123/234) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (107/202) |
| 88% (468/414) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (335/281) |
| 11% (468/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (335/54) |
| 21% (292/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (238/50) |
Petrova vs. Coin Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
