Na Li vs Sloane Stephens Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L L W W L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Li 1 - 0 Stephens
They have played 3 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Stephens winning 1. The last match between Li and Stephens was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 08-05-2014, Round: Third, Surface: Clay, with Na Li getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Na Li | 1 |
| Sloane Stephens | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(08-05-2014)
Na Li
Sloane Stephens
2
6
6
3
6
2
| Li | Stats | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 392 |
| 2 | Highest Rank | 3 |
| 43 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 10 |
| 70% (402-169) | Career Total W/L | 56% (364-282) |
| $12,713,039 | Career Prize Money | $14,316,941 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
20 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
21 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Na Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:0:27 | Average Match Time | 2:0:27 |
| 71% (66/93) | 1st Serve % | 68% (52/76) |
| 59% (39/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (31/52) |
| 56% (15/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 45% (34/76) | Return Points Win % | 42% (39/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Na Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Paula Kania
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Na Li
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Na Li
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Samantha Stosur
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Casey Dellacqua
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Na Li
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sloane Stephens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Sloane Stephens
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Sloane Stephens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
83%
(
52 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
108)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sloane Stephens
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Sloane Stephens
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Sloane Stephens
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
52%
(
45 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Sloane Stephens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70% (402/169) | Win/Loss | 56% (364/282) |
| 67% (872/434) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (825/667) |
| 57% (6813/5132) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7082/6645) |
| 73% (260/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (194/171) |
| 69% (76/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (129/75) |
| 60% (30/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (15/14) |
| 65% (36/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (26/22) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 871 | Aces Total | 869 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1314 | Total Double Faults | 1332 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:41 |
| 466.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 358.65 |
| 67% (19612/29098) | 1st Serve % | 67% (27739/41510) |
| 64% (12471/19612) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17008/27739) |
| 49% (4610/9482) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6517/13769) |
| 49% (1849/3779) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2325/5055) |
| 47% (13660/29265) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18651/42066) |
| 73% (91/34) | Slam W/L | 64% (96/55) |
| 66% (114/59) | Masters W/L | 55% (111/91) |
| 83% (10/2) | Cups W/L | 58% (7/5) |
| 68% (147/69) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (116/110) |
| 89% (40/5) | Challenger W/L | 62% (28/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) |
| 71% (400/564) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (359/640) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (68/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (77/132) |
| 60% (103/173) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (102/203) |
| 91% (387/351) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (368/307) |
| 9% (387/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (368/61) |
| 28% (182/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (278/55) |
Li vs. Stephens Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
