Na Li vs Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Mikaelian analysis and find out who is favored!
Na Li vs Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mikaelian has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mikaelian has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mikaelian has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mikaelian winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 260/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 29/ 18). Mikaelian has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Li winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Mikaelian winning 0. The last match between Li and Mikaelian was at the Hyderabad Open 2005 - Hyderabad, 08-02-2005, First, Hard with Na Li getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Mikaelian have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Mikaelian 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Mikaelian 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mikaelian has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mikaelian has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mikaelian has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Li 1 - 0 Mikaelian
15
Total
1
Mast
6
Chall
2
Slam
6
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
2
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
34
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
0
Minor
Form
70% (402-169)
Career Total W/L
53% (107-94)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$12,713,039
Career Prize Money
$17,750
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Na Li | Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Na Li | Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Na Li Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Na Li
Player
Paula Kania
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Na Li
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sara Errani
Player
Na Li
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Na Li
Player
Samantha Stosur
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Na Li
Player
Casey Dellacqua
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maria Sharapova
Player
Na Li
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Na Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Na Li
Player
Jie Zheng
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yuliana Fedak
Player
Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alona Bondarenko
Player
Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arantxa Parra-Santonja
Player
Marie-Gaiane Mikaelian
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H |
view more