Moyuka Uchijima vs Emma Raducanu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L W L
Form
W W W L W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Uchijima 1 - 1 Raducanu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Uchijima winning 2 and Raducanu winning 2. The last match between Uchijima and Raducanu was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 07-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Moyuka Uchijima getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Moyuka Uchijima | 1 |
| Emma Raducanu | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(07-03-2025)
Moyuka Uchijima
Emma Raducanu
6
3
6
2
| Uchijima | Stats | Raducanu |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (18-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 47 | Ranking | 49 |
| 47 | Highest Rank | 10 |
| 23 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 4 |
| 60% (257-171) | Career Total W/L | 65% (132-71) |
| $776,006 | Career Prize Money | $4,498,692 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Emma Raducanu
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 17 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:20:45 | Average Match Time | 1:20:45 |
| 56% (63/112) | 1st Serve % | 59% (63/106) |
| 63% (40/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (36/63) |
| 41% (20/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (21/43) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 64% (7/11) |
| 46% (49/106) | Return Points Win % | 46% (52/112) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Uchijima vs Raducanu Match Preview :
How does a player's performance on their second serve influence their chances of clinching victory? In the recent form spanning the last six months, Raducanu has managed to secure 35.44% of points on her second serve, while Uchijima boasts a stronger 44.03% in the same category. This intriguing stat often aligns closely with predicting match outcomes, potentially giving Uchijima a slight edge here.
What about return game prowess? For Raducanu, recent data shows she has won 57.3% of her opponents' second serve points, whereas Uchijima has captured 50.07%. When it comes to first serve returns, Raducanu edges ahead again with 33.91% compared to Uchijima’s 31.46%. These percentages might suggest that Raducanu is more adept at capitalizing on her opponent's serve, an indicator of her potential to dominate this match.
Now, let’s explore how each player performs under duress. Raducanu has fended off 48.59% of breakpoints, while Uchijima is slightly more resilient at 50.37% in clutch moments. These numbers are not just numbers—they are vital for real-time betting, offering insights into whose nerves might hold better under pressure.
Considering their overall match-winning records from the past year, Raducanu has triumphed in 62.16% of her matches (W/L 23/14), slightly edging Uchijima, who has won 60.53% (W/L 46/30). This similar success rate adds layers to their potential head-to-head battle.
Interestingly, surface performance cannot be overlooked. Raducanu shows her best results on hard courts with a win percentage of 68% (W/L 81/38), while Uchijima shines on clay, capturing 70% (W/L 71/31). However, both players find the grass courts challenging, with Raducanu at 54% (W/L 13/11) and Uchijima at 30% (W/L 3/7).
The players' level of competition also matters. Raducanu’s primary competition on the Main tour resulted in a winning percentage of 58.82% (W/L 10/7), contrasting with Uchijima’s impressive 86.21% (W/L 25/4) on the Challengers/ITF circuits. This context is essential when gauging their capabilities against one another.
Diving deeper into their history, Raducanu and Uchijima have faced off once, with Raducanu emerging victorious in straight sets, 6-2, 6-4, at the Hana Bank Korea Open. The memory of this win could provide Raducanu with a psychological advantage. They have not yet tested each other in ultimate-pressure scenarios like deciding sets or tiebreaks, with neither having played a deciding set or tiebreak against one another.
How do they perform when matches push them to limits against all players? If their contest reaches a deciding set, Uchijima has a more robust record, winning 64% over the last year, compared to Raducanu’s 44%. However, Raducanu has played against more formidable opponents, with their average rank being 60.81 versus Uchijima’s 147.71. This higher level of challenge could provide Raducanu a necessary edge.
Recent form reveals Raducanu’s 35.9% breakpoint conversion, modestly trailing Uchijima’s 37.56%. Breakpoint opportunities are pivotal moments that can pivot the match course, offering betting tips for those watching the game unfold.
Considering these data points, Raducanu’s superior return game stats, prior head-to-head victory, and experience against tougher opponents suggest she might be favored to win the upcoming matchup. However, Uchijima's stronger second serve and breakpoint resilience will undoubtedly pose challenges. It promises to be a tantalizing contest, but Raducanu might just have the edge to secure victory.
Uchijima vs Raducanu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Moyuka Uchijima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
7
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
54%
(
49 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Jessica Pegula
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Ons Jabeur
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Robin Montgomery
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emma Raducanu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Emma Raducanu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Jil Teichmann
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Maya Joint
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
46 of
81)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Emma Raducanu
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Suzan Lamens
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Emma Raducanu
78%
(
80 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Amanda Anisimova
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (257/171) | Win/Loss | 65% (132/71) |
| 57% (564/417) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (289/163) |
| 53% (4759/4256) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2301/1812) |
| 58% (148/106) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (85/40) |
| 69% (78/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (14/10) |
| 55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (20/10) |
| 30% (3/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 920 | Aces Total | 581 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1466 | Total Double Faults | 676 |
| 1:24:23 | Average Match Time | 1:39:15 |
| 365.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 273.62 |
| 60% (15492/25782) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8638/13274) |
| 63% (9791/15435) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5640/8638) |
| 46% (4763/10360) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2162/4635) |
| 48% (1538/3215) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (817/1698) |
| 45% (11709/25809) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6169/13387) |
| 57% (16/12) | Slam W/L | 66% (23/12) |
| 59% (17/12) | Masters W/L | 51% (19/18) |
| 67% (8/4) | Cups W/L | 86% (6/1) |
| 33% (17/34) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (23/23) |
| 63% (176/105) | Challenger W/L | 74% (39/14) |
| 85% (23/4) | Futures W/L | 88% (22/3) |
| 60% (256/426) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (130/193) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 53% (53/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (31/46) |
| 60% (75/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (28/52) |
| 93% (225/209) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (134/121) |
| 7% (225/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (134/12) |
| 24% (203/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |
Uchijima vs. Raducanu Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
