C. Shao
To Win
M. Ekstrand
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W W W WForm
W L W W L W W L L WThey have played 3 sets in total, with Ekstrand winning 2 and Brace winning 1. The last match between Ekstrand and Brace was at the W35 Jackson, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Monika Ekstrand getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Monika Ekstrand | 1 |
Cadence Brace | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Jackson(02-04-2025)
Ekstrand | Stats | Brace |
---|---|---|
73% (19-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 72% (13-5) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
729 | Ranking | 296 |
729 | Highest Rank | 296 |
18 | Age | 20 |
- | Plays | - |
2 | Titles | 1 |
58% (28-20) | Career Total W/L | 58% (98-72) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $4,100 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / Quarterfinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 5-7 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Cadence Brace
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 13 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
12 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
3:9:29 | Average Match Time | 3:9:29 |
61% (67/109) | 1st Serve % | 57% (56/99) |
57% (38/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (26/56) |
43% (18/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (23/43) |
60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (7/16) |
51% (50/99) | Return Points Win % | 49% (53/109) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the realm of tennis match predictions, examining second serve performance provides crucial insights. Over the past six months, Brace has secured 36.97% of points on their second serve, whereas Ekstrand has achieved a slightly higher performance with 40.93%. This data often plays a significant role in determining the likelihood of a match outcome. Additionally, when delving into break point conversion rates, Brace has successfully converted 38.67% of break opportunities, in comparison to Ekstrand's 40.74%. Such metrics are invaluable for live betting scenarios where conversion efficiency comes into play.
Evaluating return game statistics further deepens this analysis. Recently, Brace has managed to win 45.62% of opponents' second serve points, while Ekstrand excels with 48.85%. For first serve returns, Brace registers a success rate of 33.24% against Ekstrand's 29.34%, offering a perspective on the return capabilities of both players. Under pressure, Ekstrand demonstrates an edge by saving 51.04% of breakpoints compared to Brace's 45.38%, enhancing in-game prediction accuracy.
From a performance overview, Brace has outperformed Ekstrand over the last year with a match win rate of 62.5% (W/L 40/24) compared to Ekstrand's 56.52% (W/L 13/10). On the preferred surface, Brace shows a proclivity for Hard courts with a win rate of 60% (W/L 53/36), as opposed to Ekstrand's 55% (W/L 11/9). When delving into playing levels, Brace spends considerable time on Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, successfully winning 62.5% of matches, whereas Ekstrand's record stands at 46.67% (W/L 7/8), reflecting their engagement at similar tournament levels.
Assessing opponent quality, Brace's average opponent rank over the past year has been 469.61, whereas Ekstrand has competed against better-ranked players, averaging a rank of 421.43. Furthermore, in deciding sets over the last 12 months, Brace's win rate is 43%, in contrast to Ekstrand's more robust figure of 50%. While evaluating historical performances is valuable, considering current event statistics and individual event success is also crucial in making an informed prediction.
Based on these statistical analyses and comparative metrics, Ekstrand slightly edges out as the predicted favorite due to their better performance in second serve and breakpoint scenarios, paired with an overall higher caliber of opponents faced. However, as tennis is an unpredictable sport, watching current form during events remains vital for the most accurate forecasts.
Ekstrand vs Brace Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Unknown Player
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Capucine Jauffret
51%
(
42 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Ayana Akli
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Jada Robinson
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Allura Zamarripa
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Katrina Scott
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gergana Topalova
Player
Monika Ekstrand
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cadence Brace
Player
Lia Karatancheva
64%
(
77 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
56 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Cadence Brace
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Carson Branstine
Player
Cadence Brace
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cadence Brace
Player
Harmony Tan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cadence Brace
Player
Marie Villet
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
83%
(
45 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Iva Jovic
Player
Cadence Brace
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
76%
(
16 of
21)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
20
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cadence Brace
Player
Haruna Arakawa
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (28/20) | Win/Loss | 58% (98/72) |
55% (62/50) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (219/159) |
53% (559/501) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1837/1543) |
55% (11/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (53/36) |
64% (16/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (32/24) |
33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (13/12) |
0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
66 | Aces Total | 207 |
0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
163 | Total Double Faults | 450 |
1:22:22 | Average Match Time | 1:42:46 |
434.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 463.1 |
58% (1404/2405) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6472/10570) |
63% (887/1404) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (3974/6472) |
47% (475/1001) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1942/4098) |
47% (141/302) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (662/1273) |
46% (1135/2490) | Return Points Win % | 47% (4758/10158) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) |
53% (19/17) | Challenger W/L | 56% (86/67) |
75% (9/3) | Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) |
57% (27/47) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (96/166) |
50% (3/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (15/30) |
59% (10/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/42) |
88% (25/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (97/89) |
12% (25/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (97/8) |
26% (23/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (73/9) |