Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs JONATHAN Gray Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Makhlouf vs Gray analysis and find out who is favored!
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs JONATHAN Gray Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Makhlouf has won 48.51% of points on his second serve, while Gray has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Makhlouf, in recent form, has won 48.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gray has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.09% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Makhlouf has saved 50.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gray has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Makhlouf has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 24), with Gray winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Makhlouf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 61/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 33/ 49). Gray has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Makhlouf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 38/ 24), where as Gray has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Makhlouf has played against opponents with an average rank of 37.58 while Gray has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Makhlouf has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gray has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Makhlouf has converted 45.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gray has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Makhlouf 0 - 0 Gray
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | JONATHAN Gray |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (39/28) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (334/303) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 58% (18/13) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.06 | N/A |
Aces Total | 19 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.06 | N/A |
DFs Total | 20 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 42.32 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 62% (481/778) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 60% (287/481) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (132/297) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (33/88) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 40% (330/820) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 58% (18/13) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (18/31) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 100% (17/17) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (17/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | N/A |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Andrea Bolla
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Peter Buldorini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luca Giacomini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Igor Kudriashov
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
JONATHAN Gray Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Jonathan Gray
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Jonathan Gray
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Gray
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hady Habib
Player
Jonathan Gray
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Gray
Player
Mateo Berta
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Gianluca Acquaroli
Player
Jonathan Gray
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Gray
Player
Duckhee Lee
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
61%
(
22 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
34
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jonathan Gray
Player
Nathan Seateun
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Gray
Player
Omar El-Moslemany
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Jonathan Gray
71%
(
76 of
107)
1st Serve %
83%
(
85 of
102)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
53 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more