Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Makhlouf Panaras H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Makhlouf Panaras head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Makhlouf Vs Panaras Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Makhlouf was 2023 when he won 68% of matches played on all surfaces (23/11). Panaras was in the best form in 2023 when he had victories of 59% of his matches (17/12). In their last event played, Panaras made the Q1 round at M25+H Mulhouse, whereas Makhlouf played M15 Monastir and made the Second round.
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
Form
49% (77-81)
Career Total W/L
54% (21-18)
68% (23-11)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | Adam Panaras |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 10-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | Adam Panaras |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (23/11) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (52/27) | 58% (39/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (432/343) | 54% (358/311) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 68% (23/11) | 63% (12/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:35 | N/A |
| Avg Opp Rank | 60.29 | 34.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (792/1310) | 61% (709/1171) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (512/792) | 67% (477/709) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (271/518) | 53% (245/462) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (66/128) | 51% (52/101) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (565/1345) | 40% (453/1145) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (23/11) | 59% (17/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (22/33) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 72% (18/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 28% (18/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 36% (11/4) |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Petr Brunclik
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Erik Arutiunian
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
74)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Romeo Hadzimehmedovic
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Adriano Dzhenev
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Mikail Alimli
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Adam Panaras Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Houille
Player
Adam Panaras
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Wallner
Player
Adam Panaras
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
15
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
5-7 6-3 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Panaras
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(4) 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Felix Balshaw
Player
Adam Panaras
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Bertuccioli
Player
Adam Panaras
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Panaras
Player
Giuliano Basile Lobartolo
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Adam Panaras
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Panaras
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Panaras
Player
Alberto Morolli
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Makhlouf Vs Panaras Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
