Mitchell Krueger vs Tung-Lin Wu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L W L L
Form
W W L W L L L L L LH2H: Krueger 1 - 2 Wu
They have played 9 sets in total, with Krueger winning 4 and Wu winning 5. The last match between Krueger and Wu was at the Tyler Challenger, 03-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 7-6(4) 5-7 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mitchell Krueger | 1 |
| Tung-Lin Wu | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Tyler Challenger(03-06-2025)
Mitchell Krueger
Tung-Lin Wu
7
6
5
7
6
1
| Krueger | Stats | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (16-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 29% (6-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 159 | Ranking | 278 |
| 135 | Highest Rank | 158 |
| 31 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 4 |
| 53% (439-396) | Career Total W/L | 54% (257-221) |
| $1,082,108 | Career Prize Money | $106,780 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boisson VS Tomova PREDICTION Clay
European Open - Hamburg wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rublev VS Kovacevic PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-0 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-2 2-6 6-4 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Mitchell Krueger
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 39 | Games Won | 43 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 24 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:13:22 | Average Match Time | 2:13:22 |
| 63% (167/263) | 1st Serve % | 65% (170/260) |
| 68% (114/167) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (120/170) |
| 46% (44/96) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (42/90) |
| 33% (10/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (13/29) |
| 38% (98/260) | Return Points Win % | 40% (105/263) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Krueger vs Wu Match Preview :
- Examining recent second serve performance, Krueger edges ahead by winning 47.06% of points compared to Wu's 46.65%. Is this a telling sign? Perhaps, as it correlates strongly with match prediction accuracy.
- When it comes to return games, Wu takes the advantage by winning 48.28% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Krueger clocks in at 46.62%. In first serve returns, however, Krueger leads with 27.76% compared to Wu's 25.61%.
- Under pressure, Wu demonstrates slightly better breakpoint-saving ability at 55.86%, just ahead of Krueger's 55.6%. Could this slight edge be pivotal during tight encounters?
- Reflecting on performance over the last year, Wu has won 53.7% of his matches, surpassing Krueger's 48.44% win rate. Who's been playing against tougher competition? Krueger, facing players with an average rank of 233.33 versus Wu's 264.8.
- Analyzing surface performance, Wu excels on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, while Krueger performs best on Clay with 56%. Grass poses challenges for both, but more so for Wu.
- In direct head-to-head encounters, Wu currently leads 2-0 against Krueger, having secured four out of the six sets played.
- If this match goes into a deciding set, both players have comparable records over the past year, with Krueger and Wu winning 36% and 35% of such sets respectively.
- Observing recent breakpoint conversion rates, Wu has a slight advantage at 36.59% to Krueger's 34.3%.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
As Krueger and Wu prepare for their upcoming match, notable trends and stats provide some clarity on potential outcomes. Krueger's minor advantage on second serve points and greater success returning first serves highlight a slight edge in baseline play.
Wu, however, consistently displays superior performance in return games and pressure situations, as evidenced by his track record of saving breakpoints and slightly better conversion rates when facing opposite serves.
Their head-to-head performance shows that Wu has dominated past encounters, finishing strongly in deciding sets. This suggests he may possess the mental fortitude and match experience necessary for closing out tight matches.
Although both players show comparable long-term performance in deciding sets and under pressure, Wu's historical consistency in direct matchups and return efficiency renders him the more likely victor in this upcoming clash. Expect Wu to emerge triumphant in their encounter.
Krueger vs Wu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Mitchell Krueger
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Mitchell Krueger
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
21
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
13
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
49 of
61)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
14
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Christian Langmo
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (439/396) | Win/Loss | 54% (257/221) |
| 53% (1038/931) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (591/500) |
| 51% (9621/9212) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5437/4983) |
| 54% (272/234) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (194/152) |
| 56% (124/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (33/31) |
| 41% (33/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (29/35) |
| 36% (10/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2886 | Aces Total | 1936 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1682 | Total Double Faults | 914 |
| 1:23:25 | Average Match Time | 1:35:5 |
| 520.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.98 |
| 62% (29941/48449) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20220/30713) |
| 69% (20687/29941) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13915/20220) |
| 51% (9402/18508) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5360/10492) |
| 41% (1816/4407) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1250/2977) |
| 38% (18736/48910) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12028/30755) |
| 45% (27/33) | Slam W/L | 23% (3/10) |
| 39% (12/19) | Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 62% (8/5) |
| 49% (36/38) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (8/6) |
| 49% (237/244) | Challenger W/L | 51% (159/152) |
| 67% (127/62) | Futures W/L | 63% (75/44) |
| 52% (428/818) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (252/459) |
| 55% (6/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 46% (130/282) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (71/163) |
| 45% (130/290) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (67/145) |
| 81% (447/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (274/226) |
| 19% (447/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (274/45) |
| 19% (388/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (203/31) |
Krueger vs. Wu Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
