Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Niels Desein Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Desein analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Niels Desein Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.93% of points on his second serve, while Desein has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Desein has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Desein has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 36/ 28), with Desein winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 114/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Desein has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 131/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.9% of matches (W/L 28/ 23), where as Desein has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Desein winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Desein was at the U.S. Open - New York, 26-08-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Desein have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Desein 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Desein 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.31 while Desein has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Desein has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Desein has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Desein
239
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
154
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
53% (399-355)
Career Total W/L
60% (515-347)
63% (19-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$81,829
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Niels Desein |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (36/64) | 57% (29/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (25/36) | 45% (13/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Niels Desein
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Niels Desein |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (19/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (44/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (386/345) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 311.87 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1495/2276) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1040/1495) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (412/781) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (93/221) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (987/2450) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (18/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (19/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 68% (13/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Niels Desein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Niels Desein
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Hugo Voljacques
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
9
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Niels Desein
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
10
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Niels Desein
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Jonas Merckx
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Pedro Gabriel Rodrigues
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
Player
Niels Desein
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Desein Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
