Mitchell Krueger vs Marius Copil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Copil analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Marius Copil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.11% of points on his second serve, while Copil has won 52.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 49.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Copil has won 47.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.76% and 29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Copil has saved 58.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 30/ 27), with Copil winning 56.6% (W/L 30/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 106/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 149/ 162).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 23/ 23), where as Copil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Krueger winning 1 and Copil winning 4. The last match between Krueger and Copil was at the Ilkley Challenger, 19-06-2019, Second, Grass with Marius Copil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Copil have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Copil 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Copil 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.81 while Copil has played against players with an average rank of 326.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 32% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Copil has won 74% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 37.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Copil has converted 38.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 0 - 2 Copil
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
282
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
303
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
53% (391-352)
Career Total W/L
54% (506-423)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$693,488
Career Prize Money
$1,305,320
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Marius Copil |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
Games Won | 23 | 27 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 15 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:3 | 1:56:3 |
1st Serve % | 61% (107/175) | 56% (84/149) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (66/107) | 71% (60/84) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (38/68) | 63% (41/65) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 32% (48/149) | 41% (71/175) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) |
Marius Copil
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
6-1 1-6 6-4 |
Marius Copil
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Marius Copil |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (27/18) | 52% (17/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (245/235) | 51% (173/164) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 57% (8/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.75 |
Aces Total | 83 | 124 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 29 | 39 |
Avg Match Time | 1:59:46 | 1:41:1 |
Avg Opp Rank | 343.53 | 327 |
1st Serve % | 65% (974/1493) | 59% (557/947) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (680/974) | 78% (435/557) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (272/519) | 52% (204/390) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (53/141) | 39% (31/80) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (624/1609) | 36% (366/1017) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 61% (11/7) | 62% (8/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 80% (4/5) |
1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 100% (8/8) |
1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (8/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (6/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
65 of
122)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Rincon
65%
(
80 of
123)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
125
Total Points Won
118
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
August Holmgren
Player
Mitchell Krueger
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
14
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marius Copil
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marius Copil
Player
Yanki Erel
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Martin Damm
Player
Marius Copil
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
16
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
6
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
25 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marius Copil
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
52%
(
63 of
122)
1st Serve %
63%
(
78 of
123)
18
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
50 of
78)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
121
|
6-4 6-7(6) 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more