Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Ficovich analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 53.02% of points on his second serve, while Ficovich has won 53.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ficovich has won 49.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.84% and 31.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ficovich has saved 58.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 35/ 28), with Ficovich winning 49.25% (W/L 33/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 113/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 305/ 209), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23), where as Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 21/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 0 and Ficovich winning 2. The last match between Krueger and Ficovich was at the Parma Challenger, 08-10-2020, Second, Clay with Juan Pablo Ficovich getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Ficovich have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Ficovich 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Ficovich 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 259.49 while Ficovich has played against players with an average rank of 307.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ficovich has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ficovich has converted 41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 0 - 1 Ficovich
239
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
246
Rank
125
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
53% (398-355)
Career Total W/L
57% (350-268)
62% (18-11)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$240,230
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Juan Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:47 | 1:34:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (48/68) | 57% (35/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (29/48) | 71% (25/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 25% (5/20) | 58% (15/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (21/61) | 50% (34/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Mitchell Krueger
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Juan Pablo Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (18/11) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (42/26) | 54% (29/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (374/340) | 52% (273/256) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 61% (11/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 116 | 86 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:17 | 1:48:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.24 | 293.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1463/2218) | 60% (994/1669) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1015/1463) | 69% (684/994) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (399/755) | 54% (367/675) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (89/210) | 43% (66/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (953/2381) | 39% (669/1704) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (17/9) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (18/29) | 54% (13/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 68% (13/19) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 8% (12/1) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
82 of
132)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
69 of
132)
119
Total Points Won
98
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Bernard Tomic
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
94%
(
34 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Ficovich Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Juan Pablo Ficovich
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
