Mitchell Krueger vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.81% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.45% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 49.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.68% and 31.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 71.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 55.74% of matches played (W/L 34/ 27), with Nakashima winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 26/ 22), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Nakashima winning 2. The last match between Krueger and Nakashima was at the Orlando Challenger, 21-11-2020, Semifinals, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Nakashima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Nakashima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.31 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 233.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 32% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 35.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 1 Nakashima
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
Form
53% (397-354)
Career Total W/L
61% (184-116)
63% (17-10)
YTD W/L
72% (26-10)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$1,608,265
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Brandon Nakashima |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 18 | 23 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:22 | 1:28:22 |
1st Serve % | 65% (87/134) | 70% (83/118) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (51/87) | 72% (60/83) |
2nd Serve Win% | 60% (28/47) | 60% (21/35) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 40% (6/15) |
Return Points W% | 31% (37/118) | 41% (55/134) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
7-6(7) 7-5 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Brandon Nakashima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | 72% (26/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (40/23) | 68% (54/25) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (349/317) | 55% (439/362) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 73% (11/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 73% (11/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.71 |
Aces Total | 111 | 278 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 50 | 50 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:43 | 1:44:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 315 | 294.19 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1361/2074) | 65% (1625/2494) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (946/1361) | 75% (1222/1625) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (375/713) | 57% (498/869) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (82/195) | 34% (73/217) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (888/2224) | 37% (976/2634) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (4/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (16/8) | 79% (19/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | 71% (25/35) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 72% (13/18) | 71% (12/17) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 56% (5/9) |
1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 88% (25/22) |
1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 12% (25/3) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more