Mischa Zverev vs Marius Copil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zverev vs Copil analysis and find out who is favored!
Mischa Zverev vs Marius Copil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zverev has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Copil has won 52.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zverev, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Copil has won 47.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zverev has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Copil has saved 58.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zverev has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Copil winning 58.62% (W/L 34/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zverev has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 152/ 105), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 126/ 172). Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 149/ 162).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zverev winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Zverev winning 0 and Copil winning 4. The last match between Zverev and Copil was at the Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger, 08-10-2019, Second, I.hard with Marius Copil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zverev and Copil have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zverev winning 0 times and Copil 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zverev winning 0, and Copil 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zverev has played against opponents with an average rank of while Copil has played against players with an average rank of 312.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zverev has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Copil has won 76% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zverev has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Copil has converted 38.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zverev 0 - 2 Copil
11
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
5
Minor
643
Rank
25
High
36
Age
L
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor2
0
Grass0
303
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
52% (540-506)
Career Total W/L
54% (506-423)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$2,435,179
Career Prize Money
$1,305,320
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mischa Zverev | Marius Copil |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
Games Won | 16 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:19 | 1:12:19 |
1st Serve % | 55% (67/122) | 65% (80/124) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (47/67) | 75% (60/80) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (28/55) | 66% (29/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Points W% | 28% (35/124) | 39% (47/122) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Marius Copil
Player
Mischa Zverev
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
7-5 7-5 |
Marius Copil
Player
Mischa Zverev
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mischa Zverev | Marius Copil |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (17/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (173/164) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.75 |
Aces Total | 0 | 124 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 39 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:41:1 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 327 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (557/947) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (435/557) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (204/390) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (31/80) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (366/1017) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Mischa Zverev Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Mischa Zverev
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mischa Zverev
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mischa Zverev
Player
Mayeul Darras
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mischa Zverev
Player
Karan Singh
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Tim Handel
Player
Mischa Zverev
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
40%
(
6 of
15)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
24
Total Points Won
6
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mischa Zverev
Player
Adam Jurajda
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Collignon
Player
Mischa Zverev
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Mischa Zverev
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marius Copil
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marius Copil
Player
Yanki Erel
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Martin Damm
Player
Marius Copil
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
16
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
6
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
25 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marius Copil
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
52%
(
63 of
122)
1st Serve %
63%
(
78 of
123)
18
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
50 of
78)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
121
|
6-4 6-7(6) 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more