Mirza Basic vs Martin Klizan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
L L L L W L W W L LHead To Head: Basic 1 - 4 Klizan
They have played 13 sets in total, with Basic winning 4 and Klizan winning 9. The last match between Basic and Klizan was at the Zadar Challenger, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Mirza Basic getting the victory 3-6 6-3 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mirza Basic | 1 |
| Martin Klizan | 4 |
Zadar Challenger(16-03-2025)
3
6
6
3
3
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Moller VS Basavareddy PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Mirza Basic
Player
Martin Klizan
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 6-0 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Mirza Basic
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Mirza Basic
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Mirza Basic
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 4 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 9 |
| 48 | Games Won | 67 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 25 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:20:6 | Average Match Time | 1:20:6 |
| 67% (188/280) | 1st Serve % | 63% (185/296) |
| 65% (123/188) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (134/185) |
| 45% (41/92) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (56/111) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (15/36) |
| 36% (106/296) | Return Points Win % | 41% (116/280) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Mirza Basic
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Stefan Palosi
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
77
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mirza Basic
88%
(
61 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Martin Klizan
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Mirza Basic
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Mak Mikovic
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Martinez Arjona
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Mirza Basic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Klizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Martin Klizan
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Martin Klizan
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
53%
(
59 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Martin Klizan
59%
(
65 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Marco Cecchinato
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Martin Klizan
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Martin Klizan
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Klizan
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Martin Klizan
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (504/385) | Win/Loss | 58% (523/377) |
| 55% (1126/928) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1205/959) |
| 51% (10293/9708) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (10584/9792) |
| 57% (132/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (88/90) |
| 56% (182/143) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (329/191) |
| 59% (176/123) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (102/81) |
| 41% (14/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 21% (4/15) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 3150 | Aces Total | 2617 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1190 | Total Double Faults | 2225 |
| 1:6:28 | Average Match Time | 1:11:25 |
| 564.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 556.51 |
| 61% (27750/45697) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28158/48877) |
| 71% (19785/27750) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (19407/28158) |
| 52% (9350/17945) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10368/20719) |
| 41% (1651/4068) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2076/4671) |
| 37% (17035/45837) | Return Points Win % | 39% (18492/46850) |
| 34% (14/27) | Slam W/L | 44% (30/38) |
| 29% (4/10) | Masters W/L | 31% (15/34) |
| 46% (12/14) | Cups W/L | 68% (21/10) |
| 52% (55/51) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (146/98) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (247/194) | Challenger W/L | 57% (191/145) |
| 66% (172/88) | Futures W/L | 70% (120/51) |
| 57% (483/852) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (482/809) |
| 57% (13/23) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (30/72) |
| 57% (180/314) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (159/302) |
| 57% (146/258) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (161/280) |
| 87% (474/412) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (502/426) |
| 13% (474/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (502/76) |
| 22% (414/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (395/94) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
