Mirra Andreeva vs Peyton Stearns Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
W W W L W W W W W LH2H: Andreeva 2 - 1 Stearns
They have played 7 sets in total, with Andreeva winning 5 and Stearns winning 2. The last match between Andreeva and Stearns was at the Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai, 19-02-2025, Round: Third, Surface: Hard, with Mirra Andreeva getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mirra Andreeva | 2 |
| Peyton Stearns | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai(19-02-2025)
Mirra Andreeva
Peyton Stearns
6
1
6
1
| Andreeva | Stats | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (27-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (16-12) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 6 | Ranking | 28 |
| 6 | Highest Rank | 28 |
| 18 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 76% (136-42) | Career Total W/L | 60% (174-118) |
| $4,747,024 | Career Prize Money | $1,522,399 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Reales VS Wang PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
20 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Peyton Stearns
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Peyton Stearns
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-2 2-6 6-1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Mirra Andreeva
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 33 | Games Won | 19 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:24:26 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 59% (112/191) | 1st Serve % | 59% (108/182) |
| 65% (73/112) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (57/108) |
| 44% (35/79) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (36/74) |
| 47% (15/32) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 49% (89/182) | Return Points Win % | 43% (83/191) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andreeva vs Stearns Match Preview :
Prediction Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Form Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Andreeva has showcased exceptional prowess on their second serve, winning an impressive 48.35% of points. Comparatively, Stearns has also demonstrated commendable skill with a 44.82% success rate. This statistical correlation between second serve performance and match prediction accuracy is worth noting.
- Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: Analyzing return stats in recent form, Andreeva has proven to be exceptionally strong, winning an impressive 56.12% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Stearns has displayed formidable abilities by winning 58.31% of such points. Examining first serve returns, Andreeva boasts a success rate of 41.17%, while Stearns follows closely behind with 37.89%. These return game stats strongly influence the prediction of the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When facing pressure situations, Andreeva has impressively saved 53.33% of breakpoints in recent form. In similar circumstances, Stearns has also showcased resilience, saving 53.26% of breakpoints. This statistic holds valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Evaluating the players' performance over the past year, Andreeva has emerged victorious in 69.81% of their matches (W/L 37/16), while Stearns has achieved success in 56.36% of matches (W/L 31/24). These overall head-to-head prediction insights provide a comprehensive overview of their performance.
- Examining the Best Playing Surfaces: Andreeva exhibits their highest career surface win percentage on Clay, reaching a remarkable 81% success rate (W/L 57/13), whereas their performance on Grass courts shows a slightly lower win percentage of 67% (W/L 6/3). Conversely, Stearns excels on I.hard surfaces, boasting a 68% career win percentage (W/L 15/7), while struggling on Grass with a win percentage of only 33% (W/L 2/4).
- Player Level Analysis: In the past year, Andreeva has predominantly played matches in the prestigious Masters series, achieving an impressive 66.67% victory rate (W/L 14/7). Stearns, on the other hand, has primarily competed in the Main tour, securing victory in 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/10). When comparing these stats between players to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the event level at which they have competed.
- Previous Head-to-Head Matches: Andreeva and Stearns have previously faced each other twice, resulting in an even split with one victory each. The total sets played amount to five, with Andreeva emerging triumphant in three and Stearns in two. Their most recent encounter took place at the French Open in Paris on 01-06-2024, where Mirra Andreeva claimed victory with a commanding 6-2, 6-1 scoreline.
- Average Head-to-Head Match Duration: Historical data reveals that the average match duration between these players in head-to-head matches has been 1 hour, 29 minutes, and 54 seconds.
- Predicting Deciding Sets: Andreeva and Stearns have encountered a deciding set once before, with Andreeva emerging victorious 0 times, while Stearns claimed victory on that occasion. This information holds significant value when predicting the potential outcome if the current match reaches a deciding set.
- Extreme Pressure Situations in Head-to-Head Matches: Interestingly, Andreeva and Stearns have never played a tiebreak against each other, resulting in a tiebreak record of 0 wins for Andreeva and 0 wins for Stearns.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: Over the previous 12 months, Andreeva has consistently competed against opponents with an average ranking of 58.64. In contrast, Stearns has faced opponents with a slightly higher average ranking of 99.55.
- Deciding Set Performance Versus All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is noteworthy that Andreeva has an impressive record of winning 65% of deciding sets over the past year. Conversely, Stearns has achieved a 45% success rate in all matches played on the tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although past player performance provides valuable insights into match prediction, current event statistics play a crucial role in assessing in-form players. For detailed information on current event stats, please refer to the section below (if the players have already competed in the current event). Additionally, certain players may exhibit more exceptional performance levels at specific events, further influencing the outcome prediction.
- Break Point Conversion Rate: Analyzing recent form, Andreeva has exhibited excellent efficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 53.23% of such chances. Stearns has also displayed considerable skill, converting 49.09% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serves. These statistics hold significant importance for in-game live betting tips whenever either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in tennis match prediction models, the following article would serve as an excellent starting point (Warning: Exclusive to stats enthusiasts).
Andreeva vs Stearns Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mirra Andreeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Clara Tauson
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Linda Noskova
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Emiliana Arango
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
79%
(
48 of
61)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Mirra Andreeva
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Magdalena Frech
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Marie Bouzkova
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Peyton Stearns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Peyton Stearns
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Elina Svitolina
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
49 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Naomi Osaka
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Madison Keys
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Peyton Stearns
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Rebeka Masarova
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76% (136/42) | Win/Loss | 60% (174/118) |
| 72% (292/115) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (395/284) |
| 59% (2121/1476) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3431/2895) |
| 75% (66/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (100/74) |
| 79% (64/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (57/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (15/7) |
| 67% (6/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 343 | Aces Total | 470 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 417 | Total Double Faults | 1006 |
| 1:35:22 | Average Match Time | 1:32:53 |
| 210.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 320.33 |
| 64% (7419/11512) | 1st Serve % | 66% (12374/18762) |
| 65% (4798/7419) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7684/12374) |
| 50% (2049/4093) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2939/6387) |
| 53% (837/1569) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1125/2292) |
| 49% (5630/11601) | Return Points Win % | 46% (8394/18179) |
| 75% (24/8) | Slam W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 75% (38/13) | Masters W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 64% (21/12) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (24/23) |
| 88% (36/5) | Challenger W/L | 64% (100/56) |
| 81% (17/4) | Futures W/L | 68% (13/6) |
| 77% (135/176) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (172/289) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 74% (23/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (36/80) |
| 64% (32/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (47/94) |
| 91% (129/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (176/151) |
| 9% (129/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (176/25) |
| 41% (49/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (116/23) |
Andreeva vs. Stearns Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
