Mirko Martinez vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martinez vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirko Martinez vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martinez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martinez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 51.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martinez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 60.66% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martinez has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 6/ 7), with Zandschulp winning 46% (W/L 23/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martinez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 112/ 91), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 14/ 17). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Martinez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martinez winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martinez winning 0 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Martinez and Zandschulp was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 21-03-2019, Second, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martinez and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martinez winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Martinez winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martinez has played against opponents with an average rank of 216.38 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 155.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martinez has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martinez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 38.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Martinez 0 - 1 Zandschulp
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
885
Rank
549
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
77
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
53% (179-159)
Career Total W/L
63% (325-190)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (5-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,820,045
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Martinez VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Mirko Martinez | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) | 67% (32/48) |
1st Serve Win% | 61% (17/28) | 91% (29/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (10/20) | 56% (9/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 21% (10/48) | 44% (21/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Martinez VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Mirko Martinez
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mirko Martinez | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (11/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (147/178) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.52 |
Aces Total | 0 | 82 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:48:19 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 200.29 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (630/990) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (438/630) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (175/360) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (26/72) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (348/1000) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Mirko Martinez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Mirko Martinez
80%
(
95 of
119)
1st Serve %
85%
(
88 of
104)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Mirko Martinez
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve %
88%
(
29 of
33)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
46
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Matej Dodig
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Andrej Nedic
85%
(
90 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Yshai Oliel
Player
Mirko Martinez
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
81%
(
26 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Peter Benjamin Privara
84%
(
96 of
114)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
12
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Alexandr Binda
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Gino Romano
82%
(
56 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Timo Legout
Player
Mirko Martinez
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
84%
(
77 of
92)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
42 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
Leandro Riedi
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more