Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Tamara Zidansek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bjorklund vs Zidansek analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Tamara Zidansek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bjorklund has won 85.71% of points on his second serve, while Zidansek has won 38.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bjorklund, in recent form, has won 63.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zidansek has won 52.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 68.57% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bjorklund has saved 100% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zidansek has saved 58.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bjorklund has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 15/ 9), with Zidansek winning 54.9% (W/L 28/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22). Zidansek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 224/ 80), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 10/ 3), where as Zidansek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bjorklund winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Bjorklund winning 2 and Zidansek winning 3. The last match between Bjorklund and Zidansek was at the Copa Colsanitas - Bogota, 06-04-2023, Second, Clay with Tamara Zidansek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bjorklund and Zidansek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bjorklund winning 1 times and Zidansek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Bjorklund winning 0, and Zidansek 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bjorklund has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.04 while Zidansek has played against players with an average rank of 207.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bjorklund has won 22% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zidansek has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bjorklund has converted 71.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zidansek has converted 39.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bjorklund 1 - 1 Zidansek
280
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
135
Rank
22
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
61% (214-134)
Career Total W/L
65% (331-180)
100% (2-0)
YTD W/L
20% (2-8)
$378,603
Career Prize Money
$1,694,181
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Tamara Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 27 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:31 | 2:3:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (106/161) | 76% (142/188) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (66/106) | 58% (82/142) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (26/55) | 46% (21/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (10/27) | 64% (9/14) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (85/188) | 43% (69/161) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Tamara Zidansek
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
70 of
91)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Tamara Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 100% (2/0) | 20% (2/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 100% (4/0) | 26% (6/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 95% (21/1) | 40% (86/127) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (2/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 163.5 | 128.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (34/62) | 63% (472/751) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (22/34) | 60% (283/472) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 86% (24/28) | 39% (108/279) |
| BPs Won% Total | 71% (10/14) | 35% (28/79) |
| Return Pts W% | 66% (48/73) | 40% (288/724) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (2/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 20% (2/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Carla Tomai
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Makenna Jones
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
53%
(
54 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Tamara Zidansek
50%
(
54 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Tamara Zidansek
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Tamara Zidansek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Tamara Zidansek
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Tamara Zidansek
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Nefisa Berberovic
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Tamara Zidansek
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tamara Zidansek
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bjorklund Vs Zidansek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
