C. Paquet
To Win
A. Sasnovich
To Win
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W L L L
Form
W W L W W W L L W WH2H: Bjorklund 1 - 1 Sasnovich
They have played 5 sets in total, with Bjorklund winning 2 and Sasnovich winning 3. The last match between Bjorklund and Sasnovich was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 21-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Aliaksandra Sasnovich getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mirjam Bjorklund | 1 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(21-04-2025)
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Mirjam Bjorklund
6
3
6
1
| Bjorklund | Stats | Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| 29% (2-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (18-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 585 | Ranking | 99 |
| 123 | Highest Rank | 29 |
| 26 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 11 |
| 60% (219-147) | Career Total W/L | 59% (439-304) |
| $508,748 | Career Prize Money | $3,925,398 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
17 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Udvardy VS Nahimana PREDICTION Clay
Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat wta
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
O'Connell VS Ymer PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(7) 7-5 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
80 of
121)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
48 of
80)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
115
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 27 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:56:58 | Average Match Time | 1:56:58 |
| 62% (108/174) | 1st Serve % | 68% (113/167) |
| 61% (66/108) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (72/113) |
| 47% (31/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (27/54) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (9/15) |
| 41% (68/167) | Return Points Win % | 44% (77/174) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bjorklund vs Sasnovich Match Preview :
When examining the second serve performance in recent months, a curious observation emerges regarding Sasnovich and Bjorklund. In the last six months, Sasnovich has managed to secure 38.53% of points on their second serve, marginally trailing Bjorklund who has attained 38.55%. Such statistics offer a fascinating window into forecasting match outcomes, as even insignificant differences can be pivotal. Yet, how does this translate to their return game statistics? Sasnovich appears to hold a slight advantage, winning 53.83% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Bjorklund's 52.17%. Moving to first serve returns, Sasnovich captures 33.22% while Bjorklund excels slightly better at 34.91%. These insights become increasingly significant when determining the favorite for their head-to-head showdown.
Under pressure, performance stats reveal intriguing insights into each player's resolve. Sasnovich stands resilient, saving 48.31% of breakpoints faced, more adept compared to Bjorklund's 41.27%. Such details can be crucial indicators for those interested in on-the-fly betting strategies. Expanding the lens to performance over the past year, we find Sasnovich winning 56.86% of her matches (29 victories out of 51) in contrast with Bjorklund's 36.84% success rate (7 wins from 19 matches). This broad performance overview gives a substantial foundation for predicting potential head-to-head outcomes.
Examining their peak surfaces, Sasnovich thrives on indoor hard courts, acquiring victories in 68% of matches (105 wins, 50 losses). In contrast, Grass courts seem to be Sasnovich's less favorable ground with a 49% success rate (23 wins, 24 losses). Meanwhile, Bjorklund shines brightest on clay courts, posting a 65% win rate (128 victories, 69 losses), while struggling on indoor hard courts with 42% success (16 wins, 22 losses). Different surfaces highlight distinct strengths that could sway match predictions, especially when considering future surface-specific encounters.
Delving into player levels provides another layer for comparative analysis. Sasnovich has mainly contended on the Main tour over the past year with a strong 65.38% win percentage (17 wins from 26 matches), while Bjorklund has been engaging mostly in Challenger/ITF tournaments, achieving a balanced 50% win rate (4 wins, 4 losses). The caliber of the competition they’ve faced, with Sasnovich encountering opponents averaging a ranking of 145.27 and Bjorklund facing a 152.89, further defines their relative standings.
A direct head-to-head examination showcases Bjorklund's narrow edge, having triumphed in their lone match, a closely contested affair at the Mubadala Abu Dhabi Open. Although Sasnovich broke the stranglehold with a set, Bjorklund eventually prevailed 6-3, 6-7(7), 7-5 in a grueling battle. Interestingly, in their solitary tie-break encounter, Sasnovich emerged victorious, suggesting a potential edge under extreme pressure. Furthermore, should this match extend to a deciding set, Sasnovich's history shows a 57% win rate in such scenarios, overpowering Bjorklund's 25% success rate, a critical stat for predicting outcomes in closely stretched battles.
Lastly, break point conversion says much about aggressiveness and seizing opportunities. Recent forms indicate Bjorklund converting a commendable 45.83% of break points, slightly surpassing Sasnovich's 40.67%. As the dust settles and numbers align, Sasnovich’s overall edge across various stats points to a likelier victory, albeit factoring in current form and situational playing conditions. This forecast ultimately crafts an intriguing narrative promising a captivating confrontation on the court.
Bjorklund vs Sasnovich Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Olivia Gadecki
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Julie Belgraver
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
79%
(
65 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
46%
(
38 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
64%
(
70 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
51 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Emiliana Arango
67%
(
83 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
125)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
56 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
125)
129
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (219/147) | Win/Loss | 59% (439/304) |
| 59% (487/341) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (996/751) |
| 54% (4031/3394) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8429/7647) |
| 56% (59/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (173/130) |
| 65% (128/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (130/96) |
| 48% (23/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (113/54) |
| 64% (9/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 49% (23/24) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 1239 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 602 | Total Double Faults | 2451 |
| 1:28:13 | Average Match Time | 1:12:31 |
| 462.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.23 |
| 65% (14303/21932) | 1st Serve % | 64% (24778/38896) |
| 61% (8682/14303) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (15350/24778) |
| 47% (3579/7629) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (6183/14118) |
| 47% (1461/3083) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2284/4909) |
| 47% (10586/22367) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17617/38992) |
| 63% (17/10) | Slam W/L | 52% (47/43) |
| 25% (4/12) | Masters W/L | 50% (62/62) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 57% (17/13) |
| 38% (11/18) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (161/120) |
| 62% (107/65) | Challenger W/L | 65% (102/54) |
| 66% (78/40) | Futures W/L | 81% (50/12) |
| 60% (215/356) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (437/740) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (99/179) |
| 50% (51/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (143/263) |
| 87% (223/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (422/360) |
| 12% (223/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (422/62) |
| 16% (143/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (320/78) |
Bjorklund vs. Sasnovich Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
