Mira Antonitsch vs Vicky VAN DE Peer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Antonitsch vs Peer analysis and find out who is favored!
Mira Antonitsch vs Vicky VAN DE Peer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Antonitsch has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Peer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Antonitsch, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Antonitsch has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Antonitsch has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Peer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Antonitsch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 87/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Peer has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Antonitsch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 100% of matches (W/L 3/ 0), where as Peer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Antonitsch has played against opponents with an average rank of 128.2 while Peer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Antonitsch has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Antonitsch has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Antonitsch 0 - 0 Peer
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Antonitsch VS Peer H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mira Antonitsch | Vicky VAN DE Peer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Mira Antonitsch Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 7-6(7) 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ingrid Vojcinakova
Player
Mira Antonitsch
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
85%
(
56 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Sina Herrmann
Player
Mira Antonitsch
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
43%
(
32 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mira Antonitsch
Player
Charlotte Chavatipon
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 ret. | H2H |
view more
Vicky VAN DE Peer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Eleejah Inisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Melissa Moueza
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Aminata Sall
76%
(
95 of
125)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
14
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Nehanda Thomias
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Kundali Majgaine
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Elena Jamshidi
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Saki Imamura
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more