N. Borges
To Win
J. P. Jones
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L W L L LForm
L L W L W W L W L LThey have played 8 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 5 and Borges winning 3. The last match between Kecmanovic and Borges was at the Estoril Challenger, 02-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory 6-0 6-7(5) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Miomir Kecmanovic | 2 |
Nuno Borges | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Estoril Challenger(02-05-2025)
Kecmanovic | Stats | Borges |
---|---|---|
50% (18-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (22-19) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
49 | Ranking | 37 |
27 | Highest Rank | 30 |
25 | Age | 28 |
R | Plays | R |
7 | Titles | 17 |
56% (313-242) | Career Total W/L | 66% (315-163) |
$4,974,895 | Career Prize Money | $2,238,160 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
24 Jun 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
23 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
117)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
5-7 6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Nuno Borges
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
6-3 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Nuno Borges
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
5 | Sets Won | 3 |
46 | Games Won | 36 |
15 | Aces (Total) | 22 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
1:54:17 | Average Match Time | 1:54:17 |
58% (141/243) | 1st Serve % | 64% (182/283) |
71% (100/141) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (118/182) |
57% (58/102) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (50/101) |
39% (11/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
41% (115/283) | Return Points Win % | 35% (85/243) |
67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the performance metrics of Miomir Kecmanovic and Nuno Borges offers insights into predicting the outcome of their upcoming encounter. Over the last six months, Kecmanovic has achieved a 47.88% success rate on second serve points, narrowly outperformed by Borges at 48.09%. This second-serve efficiency is a significant predictor of match outcomes.
Comparing return game statistics, Kecmanovic has taken 48.89% of opponent's second serve points recently, surpassing Borges' 46.12%. Meanwhile, in first serve return scenarios, Borges edges out with 24.97% compared to Kecmanovic's 23.9%. These indicators are crucial for determining the favored player in head-to-head scenarios.
In terms of resilience under pressure, Kecmanovic has successfully saved 55.87% of break points, a slight advantage over Borges' 54.84%. Such data becomes useful for making real-time betting decisions during the match. Over the past year, Kecmanovic has a winning ratio of 51.61% (32/30 win-loss), while Borges has a superior 55.74% (34/27 win-loss) rate.
The preferred playing surfaces also heavily influence potential match outcomes. Kecmanovic excels on clay with a 61% victory rate (122/78 win-loss), whereas Borges shows exceptional prowess on hard courts with a 70% win rate (153/67 win-loss). Grass tends to be the least favorable terrain for both, with Kecmanovic at 46% (16/19 win-loss) and Borges at just 38% (6/10 win-loss).
When comparing participation levels over the last year, Kecmanovic records a 51.72% success rate in the main tour (15/14 win-loss), against Borges’ 54.17% (13/11 win-loss) in similar settings. Acknowledging this context provides insights into their adaptability and competence across diverse playing conditions.
Their head-to-head matches sit balanced at one win each, with Kecmanovic winning three sets and Borges two throughout their encounters. Notably, in their most recent clash at the National Bank Open - Montreal, Borges emerged victorious in a three-set thriller with a score of 5-7, 6-4, 6-4. Should the match extend to deciding scenarios, Borges has demonstrated a greater proficiency, having won 75% of deciding sets in the last year compared to Kecmanovic's 40%.
On converting breakpoints, Kecmanovic leads with a conversion rate of 29.14%, whereas Borges manages 26.25%. While head-to-head data reveals no historical tie-breaks, the player statistics against opponents of varying ranks show Kecmanovic playing against a slightly stronger average opponent rank of 80.42 compared to Borges' 85.36.
Projecting a winner from these well-analyzed figures suggests Borges may have a slight edge based on his current form and historic performance in crucial scenarios, although Kecmanovic’s resilience and tactical finesse should not be underestimated. The subtle yet decisive edge evident from Borges' superior metrics in certain key areas could very well tilt the match in his favor.
Kecmanovic vs Borges Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
58 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Sebastian Baez
55%
(
88 of
160)
1st Serve %
71%
(
130 of
184)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
78 of
130)
53%
(
38 of
72)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
61 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
83 of
184)
182
Total Points Won
162
|
6-7(3) 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
16
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
117)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Nuno Borges
76%
(
72 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
119)
9
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
24 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ugo Humbert
Player
Nuno Borges
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nuno Borges
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Nuno Borges
64%
(
76 of
118)
1st Serve %
76%
(
102 of
134)
13
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
71 of
102)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
35 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
50 of
134)
133
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 7-6(11) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nuno Borges
Player
Casper Ruud
75%
(
71 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
8
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
111
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nuno Borges
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
68%
(
110 of
161)
1st Serve %
53%
(
98 of
185)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
79 of
110)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
71 of
98)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
60 of
161)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
77 of
185)
178
Total Points Won
168
|
3-6 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
62 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56% (313/242) | Win/Loss | 66% (315/163) |
55% (749/616) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (687/440) |
52% (6832/6285) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5855/4958) |
57% (138/103) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (153/67) |
60% (124/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (132/66) |
49% (35/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (23/18) |
43% (16/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 37% (7/12) |
0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
2001 | Aces Total | 1944 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
1093 | Total Double Faults | 845 |
1:40:39 | Average Match Time | 1:32:4 |
327.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 223.71 |
61% (23981/39631) | 1st Serve % | 64% (20104/31188) |
70% (16804/23981) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (14256/20104) |
53% (8322/15645) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (5866/11084) |
41% (1537/3762) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1308/3039) |
38% (15488/40388) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12818/32160) |
51% (30/29) | Slam W/L | 59% (20/14) |
41% (35/51) | Masters W/L | 45% (15/18) |
55% (6/5) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
55% (114/95) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (35/33) |
62% (58/35) | Challenger W/L | 68% (105/50) |
73% (69/26) | Futures W/L | 75% (135/44) |
57% (280/494) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (296/443) |
50% (27/54) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (14/28) |
46% (110/238) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (90/179) |
50% (88/175) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (93/133) |
81% (332/270) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (275/252) |
19% (332/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (275/22) |
19% (223/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (203/63) |