Miomir Kecmanovic vs Lukas Greif Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kecmanovic vs Greif analysis and find out who is favored!
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Lukas Greif Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kecmanovic has won 55.25% of points on his second serve, while Greif has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kecmanovic, in recent form, has won 51.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Greif has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.44% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kecmanovic has saved 57.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Greif has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kecmanovic has won 45.76% of matches played (W/L 27/ 32), with Greif winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kecmanovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 113/ 69), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15). Greif has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 17/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Kecmanovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18), where as Greif has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kecmanovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 2 and Greif winning 0. The last match between Kecmanovic and Greif was at the USA F6 (Palm Coast), 30-01-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kecmanovic and Greif have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kecmanovic winning 0 times and Greif 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kecmanovic winning 0, and Greif 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kecmanovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.25 while Greif has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kecmanovic has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Greif has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kecmanovic has converted 40.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Greif has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kecmanovic 1 - 0 Greif
6
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
3
Minor
46
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (274-200)
Career Total W/L
67% (30-15)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,675,595
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kecmanovic VS Greif H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Miomir Kecmanovic | Lukas Greif |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kecmanovic VS Greif H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Miomir Kecmanovic | Lukas Greif |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (19/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (216/229) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
Aces Total | 75 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
DFs Total | 36 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:6:42 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 193.44 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (863/1370) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (585/863) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (279/507) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (44/115) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (526/1443) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
12
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
37 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jack Draper
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 |
Lukas Klein
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
13
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Tommy Paul
61%
(
87 of
142)
1st Serve %
58%
(
108 of
185)
10
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
69 of
108)
49%
(
27 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
54 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
79 of
185)
167
Total Points Won
160
|
6-4 3-6 2-6 7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Lukas Greif Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
QF |
Austin Rapp
Player
Lukas Greif
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Pre-Q | 6-3 6-0 | H2H |
view more