D. Evans
To Win
M. Kecmanovic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L W L LForm
L L W L L L L W L LThey have played 11 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 5 and Struff winning 6. The last match between Kecmanovic and Struff was at the Estoril Challenger, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Miomir Kecmanovic | 2 |
Jan-Lennard Struff | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Estoril Challenger(30-04-2025)
Kecmanovic | Stats | Struff |
---|---|---|
51% (18-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 23% (5-17) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
49 | Ranking | 127 |
27 | Highest Rank | 21 |
25 | Age | 35 |
R | Plays | R |
7 | Titles | 13 |
56% (313-241) | Career Total W/L | 57% (580-444) |
$4,974,895 | Career Prize Money | $5,260,960 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
23 Jun 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
6-4 1-6 7-6(5) 1-6 7-6(9) |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
64%
(
100 of
156)
1st Serve %
67%
(
120 of
178)
10
Aces
23
8
Double Faults
7
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
90 of
120)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
36%
(
56 of
156)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
61 of
178)
161
Total Points Won
173
|
||||
6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
21
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
15
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
5 | Sets Won | 6 |
45 | Games Won | 58 |
17 | Aces (Total) | 60 |
13 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
1:39:0 | Average Match Time | 1:39:0 |
60% (193/322) | 1st Serve % | 65% (227/347) |
70% (136/193) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (173/227) |
51% (66/129) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (53/120) |
23% (6/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (13/28) |
35% (121/347) | Return Points Win % | 37% (120/322) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Will Struff's second serve performance hold up against Kecmanovic? In the past six months, Struff has secured 46.42% of points on his second serve. Kecmanovic slightly edges him out with 48.38%, a statistic that often predicts match outcomes with surprising accuracy. Could this seemingly minor difference play a crucial role in determining the match winner?
The return game statistics offer more insights into each player's capabilities. Struff has claimed 47.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kecmanovic boasts a slightly better record of 48.81%. When it comes to returning first serves, Kecmanovic again surpasses Struff with a 24.01% win rate against Struff's 22.32%. Such data holds significant relevance in head-to-head match predictions, suggesting Kecmanovic might have a slight upper hand.
Under pressure, how do these players fare? Struff shines brighter here, saving 64.13% of breakpoints compared to Kecmanovic's 55.96%. This aspect becomes particularly valuable for in-game betting predictions when the tension rises to critical points. On broader terms, in the last year, Struff has managed to win 46.51% of his matches, while Kecmanovic holds a balanced 50% win record, providing a head-to-head prediction overview that maintains its openness.
Surface preference might guide us further in assessing these players. Both have shown their best performances on clay, each winning 61% of their matches on this surface. Both players mark grass as their least favorable surface, with Struff at 45% and Kecmanovic slightly better at 46%. The tour level they’ve played at also affects our prediction; in the past year, Struff has won 52.38% of his Main tour matches, marginally higher than Kecmanovic’s 51.72%. Such measures, while close, could hint at Struff's ability to slightly outperform in higher stakes.
When comparing them head-to-head, history reveals that Struff has won two of their three encounters, capturing six of the nine sets they've played. Yet, Kecmanovic emerged victorious in their most recent meeting, a grueling five-setter in Melbourne. Herein, Kecmanovic thrives under extreme pressure, winning both tiebreaks and the sole deciding set they've battled out. In recent matches, Struff has played against opponents with an average rank of 93.91, contrasting with Kecmanovic's average opponent rank of 77.48, showcasing Kecmanovic's experience against tougher competitors.
Finally, converting opportunities reveals Struff with a success rate of 30.21% in break point conversions versus Kecmanovic’s 28.17%. Such information is valuable when both players find themselves in these high-stakes moments. Given these comparative stats, while Kecmanovic demonstrates a slight edge in returning prowess and experience against top-tier players, Struff might counter this with his ability to save critical points and break when it counts. All considered, Kecmanovic may be slightly favored to emerge victorious in a potentially tight contest.
Kecmanovic vs Struff Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
58 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Quentin Halys
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
76 of
150)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
22
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
54 of
75)
62%
(
46 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
48 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
143
Total Points Won
133
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Sebastian Baez
55%
(
88 of
160)
1st Serve %
71%
(
130 of
184)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
78 of
130)
53%
(
38 of
72)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
61 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
83 of
184)
182
Total Points Won
162
|
6-7(3) 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
16
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
117)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Denis Yevseyev
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
72 of
93)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
46 of
72)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
11
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
58%
(
84 of
145)
1st Serve %
65%
(
86 of
133)
22
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
69 of
86)
57%
(
35 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
31%
(
45 of
145)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
46 of
133)
146
Total Points Won
132
|
7-6(5) 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Engel
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
18 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56% (313/241) | Win/Loss | 57% (580/444) |
55% (748/614) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1391/1124) |
52% (6818/6270) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12855/11724) |
57% (138/103) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (98/110) |
60% (124/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (273/174) |
49% (35/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (180/124) |
44% (16/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (29/36) |
0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.55 |
1996 | Aces Total | 6650 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
1090 | Total Double Faults | 3007 |
1:40:36 | Average Match Time | 1:19:22 |
327.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.61 |
60% (23926/39553) | 1st Serve % | 56% (36512/64685) |
70% (16767/23926) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (27486/36512) |
53% (8311/15622) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (14231/28164) |
41% (1533/3754) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (2197/5670) |
38% (15452/40293) | Return Points Win % | 37% (24372/65646) |
51% (30/29) | Slam W/L | 48% (43/47) |
41% (35/51) | Masters W/L | 54% (74/62) |
55% (6/5) | Cups W/L | 59% (20/14) |
55% (114/94) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (154/173) |
62% (58/35) | Challenger W/L | 64% (188/105) |
73% (69/26) | Futures W/L | 71% (99/41) |
57% (280/493) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (542/941) |
50% (27/54) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (32/77) |
46% (110/238) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (227/464) |
51% (88/174) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (175/356) |
82% (331/270) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (580/479) |
18% (331/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (580/101) |
19% (223/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (444/100) |