Milana Zhabrailova vs Leilany Ipunesso Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L W W L L W
Form
W L L L W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Zhabrailova 1 - 0 Ipunesso
They have played 3 sets in total, with Zhabrailova winning 2 and Ipunesso winning 1. The last match between Zhabrailova and Ipunesso was at the W15 Monastir, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Milana Zhabrailova getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milana Zhabrailova | 1 |
| Leilany Ipunesso | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Monastir(30-04-2025)
Milana Zhabrailova
Leilany Ipunesso
2
6
6
3
6
2
| Zhabrailova | Stats | Ipunesso |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (17-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 37% (7-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 695 | Ranking | N/A |
| 538 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 22 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (146-120) | Career Total W/L | 36% (14-25) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Grabher VS Banks PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Seidel VS Day PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zhabrailova VS Ipunesso H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Zhabrailova VS Ipunesso H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:7:18 | Average Match Time | 2:7:18 |
| 62% (45/73) | 1st Serve % | 53% (38/72) |
| 78% (35/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (25/38) |
| 36% (10/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) |
| 44% (32/72) | Return Points Win % | 38% (28/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zhabrailova vs Ipunesso Match Preview :
How does one determine the potential winner of a gripping tennis matchup between Ipunesso and Zhabrailova? Analyzing the recent performance on the second serve may offer some clues. Ipunesso impressively seizes 38.63% of points when relying on their second serve, closely edging out Zhabrailova, who captures 37.7% of these points. Will this subtle advantage on the second serve tip the scales in Ipunesso's favor?
Delving into return game stats sharpens our focus further. Ipunesso dominates a considerable 57.18% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Zhabrailova commands a slightly lower 49.74%. Interestingly though, Zhabrailova takes a marginal lead in first serve returns with 34.07% against Ipunesso's 32.42%. How will these figures interplay in their impending clash?
Let’s dive into how these competitors handle pressure, particularly when the heat is on. Zhabrailova showcases resilience by saving 43.82% of breakpoints compared to Ipunesso's 40.98%. This ability to withstand pressure might skew expectations towards Zhabrailova in tightly fought games.
Examining their past year’s performance uncovers telling insights. Ipunesso won a modest 37.04% of matches, while Zhabrailova enjoys a slightly better winning percentage of 46.55%. Can past success translate into future victory, despite the stiff competition?
Surface preference and player levels introduce further intrigue. Ipunesso thrives on grass with a win percentage of 57% but struggles on indoor hard courts. Zhabrailova, on the contrary, boasts a better record on hard courts with 59% wins. Might these surface preferences play a pivotal role in their battle?
Competitor skill levels further unravel the picture. Ipunesso navigates her journey largely in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 47.06% of encounters. Zhabrailova plays consistently in Futures circuits, achieving a 51.61% success rate. How does the competitive tier they both frequent shape the match outcome?
An interesting angle arises with opponent quality—Staggeringly, Ipunesso faces adversaries within an average rank of 114.3, while Zhabrailova's competitors average a rank of 458.76. This stark contrast highlights Ipunesso's experience against tougher opposition. Will this prove decisive?
If unforeseen pressure drives the confrontation into a deciding set, Ipunesso emerges superior with a 63% win rate compared to Zhabrailova’s 36%. Such resilience can crucially affect live betting prospects.
Lastly, breakpoint conversion capabilities highlight decisive match moments. Ipunesso capitalizes on 42.06% of breakpoint chances, inching ahead of Zhabrailova's 38.28% conversion rate. Will these pivotal breakpoint opportunities shape critical match outcomes?
Upon weighing these statistics, Ipunesso appears to hold the upper hand due to her slight edges in several key areas and prior experience against higher-ranked opponents, foreshadowing a likely victory in this captivating tête-à-tête. But as always, the incredible unpredictability of tennis keeps us on our toes, as surprises abound on the court!
Zhabrailova vs Ipunesso Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Milana Zhabrailova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Shubladze
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
71%
(
70 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Laura Rahnel
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
34 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Ena Ilic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denislava Glushkova
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Nicole Giannini
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Leilany Ipunesso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Bhunu
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
78)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Smirnova
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leilany Ipunesso
Player
Samaira Pahwa
38%
(
20 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
26 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
2-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Vlada Zvereva
Player
Leilany Ipunesso
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (146/120) | Win/Loss | 36% (14/25) |
| 54% (320/273) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (35/56) |
| 52% (2793/2560) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (398/469) |
| 59% (104/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 30% (8/19) |
| 48% (28/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 44% (14/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 318 | Aces Total | 24 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 617 | Total Double Faults | 146 |
| 1:19:37 | Average Match Time | 1:2:1 |
| 417.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 118.64 |
| 58% (7505/12870) | 1st Serve % | 56% (939/1685) |
| 60% (4525/7505) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (572/939) |
| 45% (2411/5365) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (301/746) |
| 47% (789/1664) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (97/205) |
| 47% (5948/12756) | Return Points Win % | 46% (734/1613) |
| 46% (34/40) | Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 58% (112/80) | Futures W/L | 25% (5/15) |
| 54% (141/260) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (14/39) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (27/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 51% (32/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 90% (144/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 64% (14/9) |
| 10% (144/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 36% (14/5) |
| 13% (122/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (25/5) |
Zhabrailova vs. Ipunesso Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
