Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mikhail Minakov vs Mert Naci Turker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Minakov vs Turker analysis and find out who is favored!
Mikhail Minakov vs Mert Naci Turker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Minakov has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Turker has won 52.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Minakov, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Turker has won 51.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Minakov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Turker has saved 54.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Minakov has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Turker winning 59.46% (W/L 22/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Minakov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8). Turker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 103/ 115), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Minakov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Minakov winning 2 and Turker winning 0. The last match between Minakov and Turker was at the M15 Antalya, 03-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Mikhail Minakov getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Minakov and Turker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Minakov winning 0 times and Turker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Minakov winning 0, and Turker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Minakov has played against opponents with an average rank of while Turker has played against players with an average rank of 183.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Minakov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Turker has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Minakov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Turker has converted 39.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Minakov 1 - 0 Turker
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
53% (47-42)
Career Total W/L
46% (135-161)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (10-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,750
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mikhail Minakov | Mert Naci Turker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mikhail Minakov | Mert Naci Turker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (21/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (200/190) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:19:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 264.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (529/855) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (347/529) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (168/326) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (32/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (339/854) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Mikhail Minakov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Mikhail Minakov
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Romain Faucon
Player
Mikhail Minakov
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikhail Minakov
Player
Louroi Martinez
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
0
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Minakov
Player
Gregoire Gervail
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew William Donald
Player
Mikhail Minakov
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
8
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
55%
(
43 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Jirousek
Player
Mikhail Minakov
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Mikhail Minakov
44%
(
34 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Mikhail Minakov
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(5) 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Mert Naci Turker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Metreveli
Player
Mert Naci Turker
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
53
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Mika Brunold
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Arthur Reymond
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
77%
(
70 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Sami Ben Abdennibi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Mert Naci Turker
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Mert Naci Turker
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Mert Naci Turker
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
109)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Bogdan Pavel
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 0-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
view more
Minakov Vs Turker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
