Mikhail Kukushkin vs Theo Papamalamis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W L L
Form
L W L L W W W W L LHead To Head: Kukushkin 1 - 0 Papamalamis
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kukushkin winning 2 and Papamalamis winning 1. The last match between Kukushkin and Papamalamis was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 03-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Mikhail Kukushkin getting the victory 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mikhail Kukushkin | 1 |
| Theo Papamalamis | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(03-03-2025)
Mikhail Kukushkin
Theo Papamalamis
6
4
6
7
7
5
| Kukushkin | Stats | Papamalamis |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (13-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (4-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 163 | Ranking | 671 |
| 39 | Highest Rank | 602 |
| 37 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 18 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (644-495) | Career Total W/L | 48% (28-30) |
| $3,840,550 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Arango PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bublik VS Duckworth PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kukushkin VS Papamalamis H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 |
Stats 
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Theo Papamalamis
73%
(
103 of
141)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
60 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
128
Total Points Won
124
|
||||
Kukushkin VS Papamalamis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 3:26:16 | Average Match Time | 3:26:16 |
| 73% (103/141) | 1st Serve % | 59% (66/111) |
| 63% (65/103) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (38/66) |
| 42% (16/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (26/45) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 42% (47/111) | Return Points Win % | 43% (60/141) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kukushkin vs Papamalamis Match Preview :
As we dive into the depths of this compelling matchup, let's first examine the second serve performance over the last six months. How do Kukushkin and Papamalamis stack up against each other? Kukushkin has claimed victory in 45.64% of his second serve points, narrowly edging out Papamalamis who has secured 45.54%. In the world of tennis predictions, these figures are crucial, providing a telling glimpse into each player’s resilience on their serve.
But what about their return games? Here, Kukushkin appears to have the upper hand. In recent form, he has captured an impressive 46.19% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Papamalamis’ 41.13%. However, when it comes to first serve returns, Papamalamis edges ahead with 26.09% versus Kukushkin’s 24.24%. Such insights are valuable in forecasting who might outperform in their head-to-head clash.
How do these players handle pressure moments on court? An essential metric to note is their ability to save breakpoints. Papamalamis has a slight lead, averting 53.04% of breakpoints against him, whereas Kukushkin has saved 50.62%. This crucial stat can often dictate the ebb and flow of closely contested matches, proving decisive for in-game betting strategies.
Over the past year, when evaluating overall match outcomes, Papamalamis has a slight edge, winning 53.85% of his matches compared to Kukushkin’s 52%. But results can vary greatly depending on the surface. Kukushkin seems most comfortable on hard courts, boasting a career win rate of 59%, while Papamalamis finds his stride on indoor hard courts with a 51% win rate.
Consideration of the playing level is also vital. Kukushkin has primarily engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a success rate of 58.14% over the past year, while Papamalamis has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 60% of his matches. It's illuminating to see how these levels reflect their current form.
Who are these players facing off against? The quality of their opponents also factors into our predictions. Kukushkin has tangled with adversaries at an average rank of 219.09 over the last 12 months, while Papamalamis has competed against lower-ranked opponents, with an average of 339.49. This contrast in competition may impact their readiness for this matchup.
Should the match escalate to a deciding set, both players exhibit formidable composure, with Papamalamis triumphing in 60% of those scenarios compared to Kukushkin’s 56%. A good-to-know stat for those eyeing live predictions during such critical moments.
Finally, Papamalamis’ breakpoint conversion rate of 42.86% dwarfs Kukushkin’s 29.93%, meaning opportunities to sway momentum might favor Papamalamis when the stakes are highest.
With all these factors weighed and considered, the indicator slightly favors Papamalamis due to his strong breakpoint conversion and the level of opponents faced, alongside his steady performance under pressure. Keep an eye on the dynamics, as this clash promises intrigue and competitive spirit.
Kukushkin vs Papamalamis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Mikhail Kukushkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
29 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
7 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Pavel Kotov
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Maxim Mrva
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
6-0 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Theo Papamalamis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Theo Papamalamis
73%
(
103 of
141)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
60 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
128
Total Points Won
124
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Alex Rybakov
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Keegan Smith
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
William Jansen
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
3
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Theo Papamalamis
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
41%
(
34 of
83)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Theo Papamalamis
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (644/495) | Win/Loss | 48% (28/30) |
| 55% (1526/1244) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (64/67) |
| 52% (13733/12747) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (608/632) |
| 59% (256/176) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) |
| 56% (201/160) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) |
| 56% (158/122) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (19/19) |
| 44% (29/37) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2783 | Aces Total | 147 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1295 | Total Double Faults | 96 |
| 1:14:32 | Average Match Time | 1:49:48 |
| 499.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 160.33 |
| 62% (41295/66955) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2342/4020) |
| 67% (27818/41295) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1536/2342) |
| 53% (13490/25655) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (833/1678) |
| 43% (2639/6190) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (160/398) |
| 39% (25503/66063) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1554/3932) |
| 49% (56/59) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (58/66) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (26/19) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (158/171) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 66% (306/156) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 64% (39/22) | Futures W/L | 53% (28/25) |
| 57% (583/1015) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (27/56) |
| 46% (51/110) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (200/422) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (9/17) |
| 50% (172/344) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 84% (655/548) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (29/23) |
| 16% (655/105) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (29/5) |
| 19% (484/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (29/5) |
Kukushkin vs. Papamalamis Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
