Mikael Ymer vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ymer vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Mikael Ymer vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ymer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 50.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ymer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 47.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ymer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 60.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ymer has won 50% of matches played (W/L 7/ 7), with Sandgren winning 52% (W/L 26/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ymer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 104/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 88/ 80).
- Player level: In the last year, Ymer has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ymer winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ymer winning 1 and Sandgren winning 4. The last match between Ymer and Sandgren was at the Hamburg European Open - Hamburg, 19-09-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:46:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ymer and Sandgren have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ymer winning 0 times and Sandgren 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ymer winning 0, and Sandgren 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ymer has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.21 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 279.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ymer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ymer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 31.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ymer 0 - 2 Sandgren
6
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
297
Rank
50
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
280
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
11
Minor
Form
63% (277-165)
Career Total W/L
56% (416-322)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$1,465,685
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mikael Ymer | Tennys Sandgren |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
Games Won | 20 | 29 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 0:46:25 | 0:46:25 |
1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) | 75% (50/67) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (26/38) | 70% (35/50) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 53% (9/17) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 38% (3/8) |
Return Points W% | 34% (23/67) | 41% (26/63) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(2) |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Mikael Ymer
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mikael Ymer | Tennys Sandgren |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (21/13) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (196/171) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 1.01 |
Aces Total | 0 | 181 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 0 | 28 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:52:52 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 317.07 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (686/1107) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (537/686) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (225/421) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (32/95) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (387/1130) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/12) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/6) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 70% (10/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Mikael Ymer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Mikael Ymer
66%
(
115 of
174)
1st Serve %
60%
(
87 of
144)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
71 of
115)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
77%
(
10 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
73 of
174)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
62 of
144)
163
Total Points Won
155
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mikael Ymer
Player
Taylor Fritz
67%
(
97 of
145)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
123)
9
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
0
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
54 of
145)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
123)
133
Total Points Won
135
|
3-6 2-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mikael Ymer
Player
Alex Molcan
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
18 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Mikael Ymer
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mikael Ymer
Player
Liam Broady
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mikael Ymer
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Mikael Ymer
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Mikael Ymer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Fils
Player
Mikael Ymer
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
84%
(
36 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
39
Total Points Won
38
|
6-5 | H2H |
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Trevor Svajda
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
3
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
0-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Tennys Sandgren
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
14
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
51 of
59)
74%
(
26 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
17 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
23 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(10) 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Henri Squire
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
19
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
14 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more