Mikael Ymer vs Julien De Cuyper Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W L L
Form
L W L L L L L W L LHead-to-head: Ymer 1 - 0 Cuyper
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ymer winning 2 and Cuyper winning 0. The last match between Ymer and Cuyper was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 17-02-2025, First, Clay with Mikael Ymer getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Brazzaville Challenger(17-02-2025)
6
3
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kvitova VS Kenin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Portero VS Darderi PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
5
1
Aces (Total)
0
2
Total Double Faults
1
1:26:51
Average Match Time
1:26:51
66% (35/53)
1st Serve %
57% (30/53)
63% (22/35)
1st Serve Win %
37% (11/30)
50% (9/18)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (11/23)
75% (6/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
33% (2/6)
58% (31/53)
Return Points Win %
42% (22/53)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mikael Ymer vs Julien De Cuyper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mikael Ymer 1 - 0 Julien De Cuyper
- Analyzing Second Serve Performance: A meticulous examination of recent data spanning the last 6 months reveals that Ymer has displayed an impressive ability to triumph in 50.93% of points on their second serve. Conversely, Cuyper, though formidable, has achieved success in only 42.36% of such points. It is imperative to note the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Scrutinizing Return Game Statistics: Further delving into the realm of recent form, it becomes apparent that Ymer has demonstrated exceptional prowess by attaining victory in 58.1% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Cuyper has managed to secure triumph in 49.28% of similar situations. As for first serve returns, Ymer has registered success in 35.2% of instances, while Cuyper has achieved 30.43% efficacy. These return game stats hold immense influence in determining the favored contestant in this highly-anticipated head-to-head encounter.
- Thorough Under Pressure Analysis: Evaluating the performance of both players in high-pressure situations, an intriguing picture unfolds. Ymer has exhibited extraordinary resilience by saving an astounding 67.24% of breakpoints during recent matches. Cuyper, though not lacking in fortitude, has salvaged 40.43% of such critical moments. It is worth highlighting that this valuable statistic harbors immense significance in formulating in-game betting predictions.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: A comprehensive analysis of matches played over the past year showcases Ymer's remarkable track record, as they emerged victorious in an impressive 75% of their encounters (W/L6/2). Conversely, Cuyper achieved triumph in 32.43% of their battles (W/L12/25). This overall head-to-head prediction overview offers a compelling insight into the forthcoming clash.
- Unveiling the Best Surface: A meticulous examination of the players' performance on various surfaces unearths fascinating revelations. Ymer has consistently excelled on the I.hard surface, triumphing in 68% of matches (W/L110/51), whereas their performance on Grass has been comparatively less remarkable with a 52% win rate (W/L13/12). Conversely, Cuyper has experienced their greatest success on Grass, securing victory in 50% of encounters (W/L1/1), yet their performance on I.hard has proven less favorable, with a win rate of only 28% (W/L11/28).
- Evaluating Player Level: Examining the level at which the players have competed in the last year sheds light on their proficiency. Ymer has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, emerging victorious in an astounding 100% of their matches (W/L5/0). Conversely, Cuyper's endeavors have primarily been concentrated in the same tournaments, with a win rate of 32.35% (W/L11/23). When comparing these statistics to discern the favored contestant, one must consider the relative level of the events they have contested.
- Assessing Opponent Quality: Over the preceding 12 months, Ymer has faced opponents with an average ranking of 341, while Cuyper's adversaries possessed an average ranking of 177.24. These figures provide a valuable insight into the caliber of opposition they have encountered.
- Deciphering Deciding Set Performance: For those captivated by the excitement of live predictions and betting, it is crucial to consider the outcome of deciding sets. In this regard, Ymer stands out as an exponent of exceptional skill, triumphing in 100% of such situations over the past 12 months. Cuyper, on the other hand, has achieved success in only 36% of matches played on the tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance may serve as a useful means to predict tennis matches, a comprehensive analysis necessitates the consideration of current event statistics to discern the form of players. For an indication of in-form players, one should consult the section below which provides insights into player performance within the ongoing event. Additionally, it is vital to acknowledge that certain players may exhibit superior performance at particular events, and this should be factored into any outcome predictions.
- Analyzing Break Point Conversion: An examination of the players' recent form uncovers captivating statistics regarding their ability to seize opportunities. Ymer has displayed impressive efficiency, converting 41.56% of breakpoint opportunities, while Cuyper has exhibited a commendable conversion rate of 48.57% in their quest to break their opponents' serve. These remarkable figures serve as invaluable indicators for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves facing a breakpoint opportunity.
- For avid enthusiasts of predictive models in the realm of tennis matches, this article presents a comprehensive starting point. (Warning: Only those well-versed in statistics should proceed)
Mikael Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mikael Ymer
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mikael Ymer
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Julien De Cuyper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Julien De Cuyper
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Julien De Cuyper
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien De Cuyper
Player
Pannawat Suttisomboon
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Julien De Cuyper
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Julien De Cuyper
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Isaac Nortie Nortey
Player
Julien De Cuyper
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (284/169)
Win/Loss
37% (86/148)
58% (645/469)
Sets Win/Loss
39% (204/321)
53% (5568/5007)
Games Win/Loss
45% (2187/2678)
61% (59/38)
Hard Win/Loss
42% (47/66)
60% (101/67)
Clay Win/Loss
34% (22/42)
68% (111/52)
Indoor Hard W/L
29% (16/39)
52% (13/12)
Grass Win/Loss
50% (1/1)
0.18
Aces Per Game
0.13
942
Aces Total
308
0.24
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
1243
Total Double Faults
598
1:38:4
Average Match Time
1st Match
417.95
Average Opponent Rank
281.96
66% (20498/30869)
1st Serve %
60% (5806/9651)
65% (13381/20498)
1st Serve Win %
61% (3564/5806)
49% (5030/10371)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (1672/3845)
44% (1468/3315)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (376/857)
42% (12639/30360)
Return Points Win %
39% (3602/9182)
53% (19/17)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (12/13)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
67% (16/8)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (59/58)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
68% (122/57)
Challenger W/L
11% (1/8)
78% (56/16)
Futures W/L
38% (85/140)
64% (265/412)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
36% (85/233)
48% (16/33)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (60/121)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
47% (14/30)
65% (109/168)
Deciding Set Win %
43% (25/58)
88% (252/223)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (93/77)
11% (252/28)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (93/16)
29% (201/59)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
6% (141/9)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
