Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mika Lipp vs Jim Hendrikx Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lipp vs Hendrikx analysis and find out who is favored!
Mika Lipp vs Jim Hendrikx Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lipp 0 - 0 Hendrikx
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lipp has won 50.34% of points on their second serve, while Hendrikx has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lipp, in recent form, has won 56.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hendrikx has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.92% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lipp has saved 52.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hendrikx has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lipp has won 60% of matches played (W/L 27/ 18), with Hendrikx winning 62.5% (W/L 5/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lipp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 36/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hendrikx has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Lipp has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.36% of matches (W/L 27/ 17), where as Hendrikx has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 5/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lipp has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.91 while Hendrikx has played against players with an average rank of 195.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lipp has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hendrikx has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lipp has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hendrikx has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
54% (44-38)
Career Total W/L
57% (16-12)
60% (24-16)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mika Lipp vs Jim Hendrikx For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lipp VS Hendrikx
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mika Lipp | Jim Hendrikx |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (24/16) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (53/36) | 60% (6/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (462/396) | 58% (49/35) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (24/15) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 262.02 | 175.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1265/1860) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (776/1265) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (299/595) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (93/201) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (787/1851) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (24/15) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (24/40) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (24/22) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (24/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Mika Lipp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mika Lipp
Player
Giannicola Misasi
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Mika Lipp
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Sabanin
Player
Mika Lipp
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
10
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mika Lipp
79%
(
87 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
60 of
117)
123
Total Points Won
104
|
6-1 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Mika Lipp
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Thanaphat Boosarawongse
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jim Hendrikx Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Neff
Player
Jim Hendrikx
34%
(
21 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jim Hendrikx
Player
Poonthong Komopisut
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
41%
(
30 of
74)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-7(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(7) 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Lipp Vs Hendrikx Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lipp are available here and Hendrikx photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mika Lipp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
