Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Julita Saner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fruchtman vs Saner analysis and find out who is favored!
Mika Dagan Fruchtman vs Julita Saner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fruchtman has won 31.71% of points on his second serve, while Saner has won 39.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fruchtman, in recent form, has won 48.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Saner has won 55.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.05% and 45.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fruchtman has saved 31.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Saner has saved 40.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fruchtman has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/ 5), with Saner winning 42.42% (W/L 14/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fruchtman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 37/ 41). Saner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 28/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 47/ 58).
- Player level: In the last year, Fruchtman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Saner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fruchtman winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fruchtman winning 2 and Saner winning 1. The last match between Fruchtman and Saner was at the W25 Johannesburg / Markspark, 13-09-2021, Q2 round, Hard with Mika Dagan Fruchtman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fruchtman and Saner have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fruchtman winning 1 times and Saner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fruchtman winning 0, and Saner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fruchtman has played against opponents with an average rank of 32.44 while Saner has played against players with an average rank of 105.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fruchtman has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Saner has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fruchtman has converted 29.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Saner has converted 51.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fruchtman 1 - 0 Saner
894
Rank
771
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
869
Rank
763
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
50% (53-53)
Career Total W/L
48% (129-137)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mika Dagan Fruchtman | Julita Saner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:27:0 | 2:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (45/78) | 61% (63/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (30/45) | 65% (41/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (14/33) | 29% (12/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (51/104) | 44% (34/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 10-6 |
Stats 
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julita Saner
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mika Dagan Fruchtman | Julita Saner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (9/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (86/76) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (133/189) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 54% (72/133) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (24/56) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (11/24) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (84/197) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Mika Dagan Fruchtman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kiara Cvetkovic
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Laki
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Julaluck Sae-Eung
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanni Liu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Chompoothip Jandakate
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Nikita Liebkind
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
Player
Natcharee Teerachodjiranon
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Mika Dagan Fruchtman
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
17 of
29)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Julita Saner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Meryem Alexandra Guener
Player
Julita Saner
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
81%
(
30 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Julita Saner
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaia Parravicini
Player
Julita Saner
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
57
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Zixuan Zeng
Player
Julita Saner
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Spigarelli
Player
Julita Saner
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Julita Saner
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fruchtman Vs Saner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
