J. Sels
To Win
P. Zahraj
To Win
Mika Brunold vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L L
Form
W W W L L W L W W WHead-to-head: Brunold 0 - 1 Zahraj
They have played 3 sets in total, with Brunold winning 1 and Zahraj winning 2. The last match between Brunold and Zahraj was at the Pau Challenger, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
Pau Challenger(17-02-2025)
4
6
6
2
6
1
Upcoming Match
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mika Brunold
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
1
Sets Won
2
9
Games Won
16
6
Aces (Total)
5
5
Total Double Faults
7
1:51:24
Average Match Time
1:51:24
67% (53/79)
1st Serve %
68% (48/71)
66% (35/53)
1st Serve Win %
81% (39/48)
31% (8/26)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (10/23)
67% (2/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (5/13)
31% (22/71)
Return Points Win %
46% (36/79)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mika Brunold vs Patrick Zahraj Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mika Brunold 0 - 1 Patrick Zahraj
Predictions for the upcoming tennis match:
- Recent second serve performance: Over the past six months, it has been observed that Brunold has displayed exceptional proficiency on their second serve, winning 52.16% of points. In contrast, Zahraj's performance in this aspect is slightly lower, with a success rate of 43.81%. We must acknowledge that there exists a strong association between the outcome of the match and this statistic.
- Return game statistics: Recent return stats indicate that Brunold has been formidable in capitalizing on their opponent's second serve, winning an impressive 58.12% of the points. On the other hand, Zahraj has achieved a commendable success rate of 54.27%. Comparing the players' performance in first serve returns, Brunold has a 34.28% success rate, while Zahraj has a slightly higher rate of 37.22%. Undoubtedly, these statistics have a significant impact on determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: When faced with breakpoints, Brunold has been highly adept at saving them, with an impressive success rate of 58.18%. Zahraj, on the other hand, has demonstrated a similar level of proficiency, saving 58.08% of breakpoints. This statistic holds considerable value in predicting outcomes for in-game betting.
- Performance overview: Looking at the overall performance of the players in the past year, Brunold has triumphed in 67.95% of their matches (winning 53 out of 78), whereas Zahraj has a slightly lower success rate of 57.69% (winning 45 out of 78). This gives us a comprehensive overview when predicting the outcome of their head-to-head clash.
- Surface advantage: When analyzing the players' performance on different surfaces, it is evident that Brunold achieves their highest career win percentage on Clay courts, claiming victory in 61% of matches (winning 50 out of 82). Conversely, their performance on Hard courts is comparatively weaker, with a win percentage of 44% (winning 7 out of 16). Zahraj, on the other hand, excels on I.hard courts, with a win percentage of 64% (winning 32 out of 50). However, their performance on Hard courts falters slightly, with a win percentage of 53% (winning 19 out of 36).
- Player level: In the past year, Brunold has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K. Impressively, they have emerged triumphant in 73.33% of their matches (winning 33 out of 45). Zahraj, on the other hand, has predominantly participated in the same level of tournaments, winning 56.52% of matches (winning 26 out of 46). It is important to note that predictions regarding the favored player need to be considered within the context of the event level they have been competing in.
- Opponent quality analysis: Over the past 12 months, Brunold has faced opponents with an average rank of 429.19, while Zahraj has encountered players with an average rank of 144.76. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of competition both players have encountered.
- Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is pertinent to consider the players' performance in deciding sets. Brunold has a 40% success rate in such situations over the past year, whereas Zahraj has an impressive 70% success rate in all matches played on tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance is undeniably valuable in predicting the outcome of tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to assess the form of the players. Further information regarding this aspect can be found in the section below, specifically if the players have already competed in the current event. Additionally, certain players may thrive in specific events, and this must be taken into account when making predictions.
- Break point conversion: Recent performance analysis reveals that when presented with breakpoint opportunities, Brunold has converted 43.67% of them successfully. Zahraj, on the other hand, has a slightly lower conversion rate of 43.38%. This crucial statistic provides valuable insights for in-game live betting, particularly when one of the players has an opportunity to break their opponent's serve.
If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article could serve as a valuable resource. However, please note that it caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Mika Brunold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Mika Brunold
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mika Brunold
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Alexis Gautier
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve %
14%
(
1 of
7)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
10
Total Points Won
2
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Mika Brunold
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Justin Engel
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Jakub Nicod
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Tristan Lamasine
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Mika Brunold
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
0-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Mili Poljicak
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mae Malige
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alexey Vatutin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Maxence Beauge
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
8
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
20 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Patrick Zahraj
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Patrick Zahraj
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Lukas Klein
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
13
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Harold Mayot
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (91/65)
Win/Loss
59% (129/90)
57% (204/156)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (283/211)
52% (1793/1627)
Games Win/Loss
53% (2486/2201)
44% (7/9)
Hard Win/Loss
53% (19/17)
61% (50/32)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (61/46)
59% (34/24)
Indoor Hard W/L
64% (49/27)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.22
Aces Per Game
0.31
372
Aces Total
721
0.34
Double Faults Per Game
0.36
565
Total Double Faults
820
1:45:35
Average Match Time
1:26:32
447.81
Average Opponent Rank
363.55
59% (6280/10572)
1st Serve %
62% (7418/11925)
67% (4180/6280)
1st Serve Win %
68% (5061/7418)
49% (2114/4292)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (2015/4507)
44% (511/1163)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (581/1348)
42% (4475/10637)
Return Points Win %
42% (5162/12158)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
59% (26/18)
Challenger W/L
61% (28/18)
60% (65/43)
Futures W/L
58% (101/72)
58% (88/153)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (128/216)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
58% (32/55)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (30/55)
51% (25/49)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (33/59)
84% (88/74)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (126/110)
16% (88/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (126/16)
25% (68/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (93/19)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Patrick Zahraj
View full predicted draw for Zahraj
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
