Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Miharu Imanishi vs Naomi Cheong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Imanishi vs Cheong analysis and find out who is favored!
Miharu Imanishi vs Naomi Cheong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Imanishi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cheong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Imanishi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cheong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Imanishi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cheong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Imanishi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cheong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Imanishi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 19/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9). Cheong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 27/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Imanishi winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Imanishi winning 1 and Cheong winning 2. The last match between Imanishi and Cheong was at the Hamamatsu, 17-10-2018, Second, Carpet with Naomi Cheong getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Imanishi and Cheong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Imanishi winning 0 times and Cheong 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Imanishi winning 0, and Cheong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Imanishi has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cheong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Imanishi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cheong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Imanishi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cheong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Imanishi 0 - 1 Cheong
853
Rank
187
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
485
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
54% (292-247)
Career Total W/L
57% (46-35)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$43,722
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Miharu Imanishi | Naomi Cheong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:0 | 2:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (55/89) | 53% (47/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (32/55) | 64% (30/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (18/34) | 61% (25/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (33/88) | 44% (39/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Naomi Cheong
Player
Miharu Imanishi
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Miharu Imanishi | Naomi Cheong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Miharu Imanishi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Axana Mareen
Player
Miharu Imanishi
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Sem Hazes
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Emilie Ballintijn
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Miharu Imanishi
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve %
25%
(
2 of
8)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
8 of
8)
20
Total Points Won
3
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Miharu Imanishi
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Anna Zyryanova
81%
(
86 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
14
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
52 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
106)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Sylvie Zund
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miharu Imanishi
Player
Stefania Bojica
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Naomi Cheong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Danilina
Player
Naomi Cheong
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcela Zacarias
Player
Naomi Cheong
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Hind Abdelouahid
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Valentina Ivanov
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Naomi Cheong
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Kanako Morisaki
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naomi Cheong
Player
Nana Kawagishi
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Naomi Cheong
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
49%
(
18 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Imanishi Vs Cheong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
