Miguel Damas vs Ryan Nijboer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W W L L W W W W L LHead-2-Head: Damas 2 - 2 Nijboer
They have played 10 sets in total, with Damas winning 5 and Nijboer winning 5. The last match between Damas and Nijboer was at the M25 Mataro, 22-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Miguel Damas getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miguel Damas | 2 |
| Ryan Nijboer | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Mataro(22-05-2025)
Miguel Damas
Ryan Nijboer
6
4
6
0
| Damas | Stats | Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (38-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (27-23) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 401 | Ranking | 470 |
| 360 | Highest Rank | 371 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 3 |
| 59% (238-168) | Career Total W/L | 57% (282-215) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $5,735 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Misolic VS Borges PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruud VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Miguel Damas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Miguel Damas
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
79%
(
79 of
100)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Miguel Damas
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 41 | Games Won | 42 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 2:2:44 | Average Match Time | 2:2:44 |
| 75% (220/294) | 1st Serve % | 63% (157/251) |
| 53% (116/220) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (96/157) |
| 45% (33/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (33/94) |
| 60% (18/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (20/43) |
| 49% (122/251) | Return Points Win % | 49% (145/294) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Damas vs Nijboer Match Preview :
- Nijboer has a slight edge in second serve performance with 43.1% points won compared to Damas's 41.52%. Will this serve performance be a key factor?
- In returning games, Nijboer also leads with 47.18% success against second serves versus Damas's 46.22%. However, Damas returns first serves better at 31.69% compared to Nijboer's 28.52%.
- Under pressure, Damas has a slight advantage, saving 54.43% of breakpoints compared to Nijboer's 52.93%.
- Over the last year, Damas has a higher match win rate at 59.49%, while Nijboer has won 57.45% of matches.
- Nijboer's most effective surface is Hard courts with a 59% win rate, while Damas excels on Clay with a 60% win rate. Is the match venue crucial here?
- Both players share a similar success rate in Futures/ITF tournaments at 67.92% over the past year.
- In direct head-to-head encounters, Nijboer leads with two wins to one over Damas, including a recent Hard court victory.
- Extreme pressure analysis shows Nijboer has not won a tiebreak against Damas, who has won one.
- Considering opponents' quality, Damas has faced more highly ranked players, with an average rank of 392.59, compared to Nijboer's 483.44.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Damas has the upper hand with a 59% win rate over the last year, surpassing Nijboer's 47%.
- Damas outperforms Nijboer in converting break points recently, achieving a 40.72% success rate against Nijboer's 36.29%.
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
Nijboer holds an advantage in second serve and return performance, potentially giving him a slight edge if serves are decisive in this matchup.
Damas has demonstrated a superior ability to play under pressure by saving more breakpoints and converting break opportunities more consistently, factors that could play a critical role in this contest.
While both athletes exhibit comparable success in lower-level tournaments, Nijboer has triumphed in a majority of their past meetings.
Although the advantage in career head-to-head matches might suggest a tilt towards Nijboer, Damas's ability to convert breakpoints and his better performance against higher-ranked opponents cannot be ignored.
On balance, Damas appears to have a slight edge, especially if the match extends to a deciding set, given his stronger performance metrics and ability to play under pressure. Therefore, Damas is likely to emerge as the winner in this tightly contested match.
Damas vs Nijboer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Miguel Damas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Miguel Damas
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Felix Gill
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
43%
(
13 of
30)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Leo Raquillet
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Pierre Delage
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Mario Martinez Serrano
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Etienne Donnet
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Ryan Nijboer
77%
(
74 of
96)
1st Serve %
79%
(
77 of
98)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alec Deckers
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
37%
(
24 of
65)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Romain Faucon
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Jarno Jans
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Stijn Slump
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (238/168) | Win/Loss | 57% (282/215) |
| 56% (531/415) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (650/507) |
| 52% (4728/4331) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5685/5062) |
| 54% (66/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (97/67) |
| 61% (172/108) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (177/128) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (8/20) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 353 | Aces Total | 1132 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 850 | Total Double Faults | 1749 |
| 1:30:39 | Average Match Time | 1:34:6 |
| 423.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 482.97 |
| 66% (14957/22684) | 1st Serve % | 63% (18849/29874) |
| 63% (9351/14957) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12601/18849) |
| 49% (3783/7726) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5055/11025) |
| 46% (1120/2440) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1531/3368) |
| 43% (9349/21901) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12953/30395) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 42% (38/52) | Challenger W/L | 43% (35/47) |
| 63% (200/115) | Futures W/L | 60% (246/164) |
| 58% (235/402) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (275/485) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 53% (66/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (63/133) |
| 58% (80/138) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (76/163) |
| 86% (232/200) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (296/245) |
| 14% (232/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (296/51) |
| 22% (174/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (201/37) |
Damas vs. Nijboer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
