Prediction of Michika Ozeki vs Yan-Tung Ki Head-to-Head, At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
48% (280-298)
Career Total W/L
8% (3-34)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Michika Ozeki
Player
Yan-Tung Ki
45%
(
19 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| stats | Michika Ozeki | Yan-Tung Ki |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 45% (19/42) | 69% (48/70) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 58% (11/19) | 44% (21/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 74% (17/23) | 36% (8/22) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points Win % | 59% (41/70) | 33% (14/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michika Ozeki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eva Garkusha
Player
Michika Ozeki
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Sejal Gopal Bhutada
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarah Rokusek
Player
Michika Ozeki
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Milanese
Player
Michika Ozeki
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Michika Ozeki
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Michika Ozeki
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Francesca Simpson
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Michika Ozeki
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Elizabet Hamaliy
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
67
|
1-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Yan-Tung Ki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nana Kawagishi
Player
Yan-Tung Ki
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Yan-Tung Ki
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan-Tung Ki
Player
Naoko Eto
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michika Ozeki | Yan-Tung Ki |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 48% (280/298) | 8% (3/34) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (642/672) | 11% (8/68) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (5997/5992) | 30% (183/436) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (205/208) | 8% (3/34) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (13/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (44/54) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 45% (18/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.04 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 240 | 1 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 934 | 18 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 519.07 | 611.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (14190/22334) | 66% (414/623) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 58% (8260/14190) | 50% (206/414) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3579/8144) | 34% (71/209) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1420/2894) | 43% (24/56) |
| Return Points Win % | 47% (10423/22117) | 41% (226/548) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (157/170) | 14% (2/12) |
| Futures W/L | 49% (123/127) | 5% (1/21) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (280/577) | 8% (3/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (59/116) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 48% (77/159) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (290/247) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (290/43) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (288/33) | 0% (33/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
