Michele Ribecai vs Pijus Vaitiekunas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W L L W W L W L
Form
W L W W W W L W W LHead-To-Head: Ribecai 1 - 0 Vaitiekunas
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ribecai winning 2 and Vaitiekunas winning 0. The last match between Ribecai and Vaitiekunas was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 18-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Michele Ribecai getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Michele Ribecai | 1 |
Pijus Vaitiekunas | 0 |
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(18-02-2025)
6
1
6
1
Ribecai | Stats | Vaitiekunas |
---|---|---|
61% (11-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (11-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
761 | Ranking | N/A |
739 | Highest Rank | |
22 | Age | 22 |
- | Plays | - |
0 | Titles | 0 |
62% (74-45) | Career Total W/L | 55% (77-63) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Djokovic PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Ribecai VS Vaitiekunas H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
32
|
Ribecai VS Vaitiekunas H2H Stats
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:0:3 | Average Match Time | 1:0:3 |
73% (32/44) | 1st Serve % | 64% (25/39) |
72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (14/25) |
58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (4/14) |
50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
54% (21/39) | Return Points Win % | 32% (14/44) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michele Ribecai vs Pijus Vaitiekunas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michele Ribecai 1 - 0 Pijus Vaitiekunas
- Recent Form Analysis: Analyzing the recent form of the players, it is evident that Ribecai has displayed a commendable second serve performance, winning 51.63% of points in the last 6 months. In contrast, Vaitiekunas has been unable to secure any victories in this aspect. The correlation between this crucial statistic and match prediction accuracy cannot be ignored.
- Return Game Assessment: Delving into the return game statistics of Ribecai and Vaitiekunas, it is apparent that Ribecai has been dominant in recent form. Winning an impressive 54.02% of their opponent's second serve points, Ribecai has showcased their superiority. On the other hand, Vaitiekunas has failed to secure any victories in this area. The same trend is observed in first serve returns, with Ribecai winning 34.19% of points and Vaitiekunas unable to make an impact. These statistics hold great importance in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Evaluation: When under pressure, Ribecai has proven to be a formidable opponent by successfully saving 59.04% of breakpoints in recent form. Conversely, Vaitiekunas has struggled to save any breakpoints, showing a statistic of 0%. This valuable information can be utilized for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Synopsis: Examining the past year's performance, Ribecai has emerged triumphant in 61.43% of matches played, boasting an impressive record of 43 wins and 27 losses. Similarly, Vaitiekunas has achieved a commendable success rate of 61.29%, with 19 wins and 12 losses. This overall overview provides significant insight into their head-to-head prediction.
- Surface Expertise: When considering their career statistics on different surfaces, Ribecai has displayed exemplary proficiency on I.hard, attaining a remarkable win percentage of 75% (3 wins and 1 loss). However, their performance on Hard surfaces is slightly less remarkable, with a win percentage of 61% (25 wins and 16 losses). Alternatively, Vaitiekunas has excelled on Hard surfaces, securing a win percentage of 57% (51 wins and 38 losses). Conversely, their performance on I.hard surfaces has been subpar, with a win percentage of 0% (0 wins and 2 losses).
- Player Level Consideration: Over the past year, Ribecai has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize money of $10K. Displaying their prowess, Ribecai has triumphed in 61.43% of matches (43 wins and 27 losses). Similarly, Vaitiekunas has primarily competed in the same tournaments, achieving a commendable success rate of 61.29% (19 wins and 12 losses). When evaluating the statistics between the players to predict the favored contender, it is essential to consider the relative event level they have been actively participating in.
- Opponent Quality Analysis: Over the course of the last 12 months, Ribecai has encountered opponents with an average rank of 292.96. On the other hand, Vaitiekunas has faced players with an average rank of 147.19. This data sheds light on the level of competition faced by both players.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live match predictions and betting, it is imperative to examine each player's performance in deciding sets. Ribecai has emerged victorious in 35% of deciding sets over the past 12 months, while Vaitiekunas has exhibited exceptional prowess by winning 71% of all matches on tour that have entered deciding sets.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance is undeniably valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to scrutinize current event statistics. These statistics provide insights into the players' present form and performance levels. Therefore, it is recommended to refer to the section below (if available) for a comprehensive understanding of the players' performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, considering that certain players thrive in specific events, this aspect should not be disregarded when predicting the outcome.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Recent form analysis reveals that Ribecai has been proficient in converting breakpoint opportunities, boasting a conversion rate of 42.35%. In contrast, Vaitiekunas has been unable to capitalize on their chances to break their opponents' serve, converting 0% of such opportunities. These statistics prove to be invaluable for live in-game betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you have an affinity for predictive models in the realm of tennis, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, please note that this resource is tailored towards statistical enthusiasts.
Michele Ribecai Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marek Gengel
Player
Michele Ribecai
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
52%
(
14 of
27)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
28
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michele Ribecai
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Kerem Yilmaz
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tanguy Genier
Player
Michele Ribecai
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alexandr Binda
Player
Michele Ribecai
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
12
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Maxwell Exsted
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Michele Ribecai
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Pijus Vaitiekunas Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sydney Zick
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Moise Kouame
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pijus Vaitiekunas
Player
Bogdan Seleznev
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pijus Vaitiekunas
Player
Ewen Lumsden
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pijus Vaitiekunas
Player
Nyo Van Dyck
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 7-6(5) 13-11 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (74/45) | Win/Loss | 55% (77/63) |
62% (164/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (168/145) |
56% (1366/1060) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1534/1444) |
62% (31/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (58/42) |
62% (38/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (19/19) |
63% (5/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
86 | Aces Total | 61 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
226 | Total Double Faults | 142 |
1:18:17 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
239.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 173.06 |
60% (3349/5612) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2017/3216) |
63% (2108/3349) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1234/2017) |
50% (1142/2263) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (542/1199) |
46% (317/690) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (134/325) |
45% (2576/5739) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1269/3189) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
62% (74/45) | Futures W/L | 55% (77/62) |
62% (74/119) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (77/140) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (11/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
41% (11/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (19/33) |
88% (80/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (76/67) |
13% (80/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (76/9) |
10% (39/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (64/10) |
See recent tennis photos of Ribecai and Vaitiekunas
Other Predictions
- Loading news...