Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michal Schmid vs Issam Haitham Taweel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmid vs Taweel analysis and find out who is favored!
Michal Schmid vs Issam Haitham Taweel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmid has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Taweel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmid, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Taweel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmid has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Taweel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmid has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Taweel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmid has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 14/ 18). Taweel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 83/ 104), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 101/ 166).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Schmid winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Schmid winning 4 and Taweel winning 1. The last match between Schmid and Taweel was at the Egypt F3 (Sharm El Sheikh), 31-01-2017, First, Hard with Michal Schmid getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmid and Taweel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Schmid winning 1 times and Taweel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Schmid winning 1, and Taweel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmid has played against opponents with an average rank of while Taweel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmid has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Taweel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmid has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Taweel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmid 2 - 0 Taweel
Ret.
Rank
373
High
35
Age
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
34
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
56% (262-207)
Career Total W/L
41% (184-270)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,325
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michal Schmid | Issam Haitham Taweel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:0 | 0:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (63/88) | 63% (52/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (43/63) | 67% (35/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (35/82) | 35% (31/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Michal Schmid
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michal Schmid | Issam Haitham Taweel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michal Schmid Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilija Vucic
Player
Michal Schmid
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
12
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Michal Schmid
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julien De Cuyper
Player
Michal Schmid
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Michal Schmid
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alon Elia
Player
Michal Schmid
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michal Schmid
Player
Marek Gengel
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Michal Schmid
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Richard Gabb
Player
Michal Schmid
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Schmid
Player
Bastian Wagner
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Schmid
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
84%
(
58 of
69)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Issam Haitham Taweel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Mattia Bellucci
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Niklas Johansson
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Schmid Vs Taweel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
