M. Krajci
To Win
A. Bakshi
To Win
Michal Krajci vs Filiberto Fumagalli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Krajci 1 - 0 Fumagalli
They have played 2 sets in total, with Krajci winning 2 and Fumagalli winning 0. The last match between Krajci and Fumagalli was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 18-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Michal Krajci getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Michal Krajci | 1 |
| Filiberto Fumagalli | 0 |
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(18-02-2025)
6
1
6
2
| Krajci | Stats | Fumagalli |
|---|---|---|
| 83% (24-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (6-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | ||
| 20 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (93-54) | Career Total W/L | 48% (55-59) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Michal Krajci
Player
Filiberto Fumagalli
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:3:54 | Average Match Time | 1:3:54 |
| 78% (29/37) | 1st Serve % | 73% (36/49) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
| 38% (3/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 23% (3/13) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (28/49) | Return Points Win % | 32% (12/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michal Krajci vs Filiberto Fumagalli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michal Krajci 1 - 0 Filiberto Fumagalli
Predictions Theme: Insights for Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Krajci has demonstrated a second serve success rate of 46.11%, while Fumagalli has achieved 48.21% triumphs. This statistical analysis has revealed a substantial correlation between these figures and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Examining the return statistics in recent form, Krajci has acquired an impressive 52.09% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Fumagalli has achieved a slightly lower rate of 46.36%. Likewise, when considering first serve returns, Krajci has attained 34.99%, whereas Fumagalli has achieved 21.67%. These percentages play a significant role in determining the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When under pressure, Krajci has impressively saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, slightly surpassing Fumagalli, who has saved 58.33%. This valuable statistical metric holds great relevance in predicting outcomes for in-game betting opportunities.
- Performance Overview: In the past year, Krajci has showcased exceptional form by winning an impressive 64.79% of their matches (W/L ratio: 46/25). On the other hand, Fumagalli has secured victories in 48.48% of their matches (W/L ratio: 16/17). These statistics provide an insightful overview for predicting the impending head-to-head encounter.
- Surface Specialization: Krajci has displayed their greatest career surface triumph on Hard courts, conquering 70% of matches (W/L ratio: 56/24). In contrast, their success rate drops to 46% (W/L ratio: 11/13) on I.hard courts. Comparatively, Fumagalli excels on Hard courts with a career win percentage of 57% (W/L ratio: 24/18), yet struggles on I.hard courts, managing a win percentage of 0% (W/L ratio: 0/6).
- Player Level Evaluation: Notably, Krajci has predominantly competed in the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments over the previous year, triumphing in 64.79% of their matches (W/L ratio: 46/25). Conversely, Fumagalli has primarily engaged in the same tournaments, securing victories in 50% of matches (W/L ratio: 16/16). It is crucial to acknowledge the relative event level when drawing comparisons between players to determine the favored candidate.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Throughout the past twelve months, Krajci has encountered opponents with an average rank of 220.54, while Fumagalli has faced players with an average rank of 173.15. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered, aiding in the prediction process.
- Decisive Set Performance Analysis: If this match extends to a deciding set, Krajci has shown superiority by winning 56% of such sets over the past year, whereas Fumagalli lags behind with a mere 20% success rate in all matches played on tour. These statistics prove valuable for both live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
- Current Event H2H Statistics: While relying on past player performance is conducive to predicting tennis matches, the evaluation should also consider the current event statistics to gauge in-form players accurately. For this purpose, please refer to the section below (only applicable if the players have participated in the ongoing event). Furthermore, considering the favorable performance of certain players at specific events is crucial in selecting the eventual outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Krajci has showcased admirable proficiency, converting 45.32% of breakpoint opportunities. Fumagalli, meanwhile, has achieved a respectable conversion rate of 50% when capitalizing on chances to break their opponents' serve. These critical statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when players face breakpoint opportunities.
- If you have an inclination towards comprehensive models that accurately forecast tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (WARNING: For enthusiasts of statistical analysis).
Michal Krajci Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Preston Brown
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Oskari Paldanius
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
123)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
123)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Vadym Ursu
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
1
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
10
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
27%
(
8 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Louis Herman
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Ruslan Tiukaev
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Amr Elsayed
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
6
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Andriy Poritskyy
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Filiberto Fumagalli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Filiberto Fumagalli
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Filiberto Fumagalli
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
36 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
15 of
62)
57
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filiberto Fumagalli
Player
Aryan Lakshmanan
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Filiberto Fumagalli
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (93/54) | Win/Loss | 48% (55/59) |
| 62% (203/127) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (122/124) |
| 56% (1750/1386) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1150/1153) |
| 72% (67/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (27/21) |
| 48% (13/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (28/32) |
| 48% (13/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 277 | Aces Total | 37 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 323 | Total Double Faults | 80 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 247.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 203.79 |
| 66% (3552/5359) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1783/2721) |
| 68% (2406/3552) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1012/1783) |
| 44% (795/1807) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (416/938) |
| 42% (269/645) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (100/244) |
| 42% (2346/5638) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1012/2681) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/6) |
| 65% (93/51) | Futures W/L | 51% (55/53) |
| 63% (91/144) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (54/112) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (10/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (8/22) |
| 51% (20/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 90% (97/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (59/50) |
| 10% (97/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (59/9) |
| 12% (50/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (54/4) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michal Krajci
View full predicted draw for Krajci
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
