Michal Konecny vs Sem Verbeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Konecny vs Verbeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Michal Konecny vs Sem Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Konecny has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Verbeek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Konecny, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Verbeek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Konecny has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verbeek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Konecny has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Verbeek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Konecny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 217/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Verbeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 76/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Konecny winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Konecny winning 2 and Verbeek winning 0. The last match between Konecny and Verbeek was at the Bahrain F2 (Manama), 28-03-2017, First, Hard with Michal Konecny getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Konecny and Verbeek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Konecny winning 0 times and Verbeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Konecny winning 1, and Verbeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Konecny has played against opponents with an average rank of while Verbeek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Konecny has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verbeek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Konecny has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verbeek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Konecny 1 - 0 Verbeek
14
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
Ret.
Rank
285
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
531
High
30
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (463-337)
Career Total W/L
57% (104-78)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Michal Konecny | Sem Verbeek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (48/68) | 59% (38/64) |
1st Serve Win% | 73% (35/48) | 66% (25/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 54% (14/26) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (2/8) |
Return Points W% | 39% (25/64) | 31% (21/68) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(1) 6-4 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Sem Verbeek
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Michal Konecny | Sem Verbeek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michal Konecny Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Lucas Catarina
Player
Michal Konecny
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-7(3) 7-5 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Michal Konecny
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
77)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Michal Konecny
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Luca Giacomini
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
80%
(
69 of
86)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Runhao Hua
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Moez Echargui
Player
Michal Konecny
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Rishab Agarwal
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Sidane Pontjodikromo
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Sem Verbeek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sem Verbeek
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Sem Verbeek
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martin Krumich
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evan Furness
Player
Sem Verbeek
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Sem Verbeek
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Francisco Cabral
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more