Michal Konecny vs Daniel DE Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Konecny vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Michal Konecny vs Daniel DE Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Konecny has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jonge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Konecny, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Konecny has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Konecny has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jonge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Konecny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 217/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Jonge has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Konecny has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Konecny has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Konecny has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Konecny 0 - 0 Jonge
14
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Michal Konecny | Daniel DE Jonge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Michal Konecny Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Lucas Catarina
Player
Michal Konecny
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-7(3) 7-5 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Michal Konecny
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
77)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Michal Konecny
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Luca Giacomini
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
80%
(
69 of
86)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Runhao Hua
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Moez Echargui
Player
Michal Konecny
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Rishab Agarwal
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Konecny
Player
Sidane Pontjodikromo
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Daniel DE Jonge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
8
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more