Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michaela Haet vs Se-Hyun Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haet vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Michaela Haet vs Se-Hyun Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haet has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kim has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haet, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haet has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haet has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kim winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haet has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 40/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 69/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Haet winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Haet winning 2 and Kim winning 0. The last match between Haet and Kim was at the Hua Hin, 14-07-2017, Semifinals, Hard with Michaela Haet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Haet and Kim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Haet winning 0 times and Kim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Haet winning 0, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haet has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kim has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haet has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haet has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Haet 1 - 0 Kim
859
Rank
521
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
58% (42-30)
Career Total W/L
51% (69-65)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michaela Haet | Se-Hyun Kim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (38/52) | 64% (39/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (28/38) | 56% (22/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (8/14) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (30/61) | 31% (16/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Michaela Haet
Player
Se-Hyun Kim
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michaela Haet | Se-Hyun Kim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michaela Haet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Bozovic
Player
Michaela Haet
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Mays
Player
Michaela Haet
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Michaela Haet
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
84%
(
54 of
64)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Michaela Haet
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Michaela Haet
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Michaela Haet
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Haet
Player
Stefani Webb
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
55 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michaela Haet
Player
Elena Micic
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Michaela Haet
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Se-Hyun Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Se-Hyun Kim
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maia Lumsden
Player
Se-Hyun Kim
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Se-Hyun Kim
Player
You-Na Sul
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Se-Hyun Kim
Player
Cherry Kim
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Se-Hyun Kim
Player
Taehee Kim
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 6-7(5) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hua-Chen Lee
Player
Se-Hyun Kim
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Se-Hyun Kim
Player
Dan Ni Wang
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aunchisa Chanta
Player
Se-Hyun Kim
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Haet Vs Kim Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
